Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Apr 5, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 4, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Automating Large-scale Health Care Service Feedback Analysis: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study

Alexander G, Bahja M, Butt GF

Automating Large-scale Health Care Service Feedback Analysis: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(4):e29385

DOI: 10.2196/29385

PMID: 35404254

PMCID: 9039814

Automating Large Scale Healthcare Service Feedback Analysis: Using Natural Language Processing and Topic Modelling

  • George Alexander; 
  • Mohammed Bahja; 
  • Gibran Farook Butt

ABSTRACT

Background:

Obtaining patient feedback is an essential mechanism for healthcare service providers to assess their quality and effectiveness. Unlike assessments of clinical outcomes, feedback from patients offers insights into their lived experience. The Department of Health and Social Care in England via NHS Digital operates a patient feedback web service through which patients can leave feedback of their experiences into structured and free-text report forms. Free-text feedback compared to structured questionnaires may be less biased by the feedback collector thus more representative; however, it is harder to analyse in large quantities and challenging to derive meaningful, quantitative outcomes for better representation of the general public feedback.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to use natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques along with an interactive web application to provide unique insights into NHS services from patient experience feedback.

Methods:

This study details the development of a text analysis tool that utilises contemporary NLP and machine learning models to analyse free-text clinical service reviews to develop a robust classification model, and interactive visualisation web application using multiple technologies such as; Vue.js, C# serverless API, and SQL server all hosted on the Microsoft Azure Platform, which facilitates exploration of the data, designed for the use by all stakeholders.

Results:

Of the 11,103 possible clinical services that could be reviewed across England, 2030 different services had received a combined total of 51,845 reviews between 1/10/2017 and 31/10/2019. Dominant topics were identified for the entire corpus and then negative and positive sentiment topics in turn. Reviews containing high and low sentiment topics occurred more frequently than less polarised topics. Time series analysis can identify trends in topic and sentiment occurrence frequency across the study period.

Conclusions:

This study generated insights into the patient experience of NHS services by using modern NLP, machine learning and visualisation techniques. This study can help future efforts to find and visualise useful, actionable and unique information from free-text patient reviews.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Alexander G, Bahja M, Butt GF

Automating Large-scale Health Care Service Feedback Analysis: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(4):e29385

DOI: 10.2196/29385

PMID: 35404254

PMCID: 9039814

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.