Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging
Date Submitted: Mar 30, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 30, 2021 - May 25, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 28, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Usability and impact of a low-cost robotic pet for older adults and people with dementia: A qualitative content analysis of user experiences and perceptions on consumer websites
ABSTRACT
Background:
Worldwide, populations are ageing exponentially. Older adults and people with dementia are especially at risk of social isolation and loneliness. Social robots, including robotic pets, have had positive impacts on older adults and people with dementia by providing companionship, improving mood, reducing agitation and facilitating social interaction. Nevertheless, the issue of affordability can hinder technology access. The Joy for All (JfA) robotic pets have showed promise as examples of low-cost alternatives. However, there has been no research which investigated the usability and impact of such low-cost robotic pets based on perceptions and experiences of its use with older adults and people with dementia.
Objective:
The aim of our study was to explore the usability and impact of the JfA robotic cat, as an example of a low-cost robot, based on perceptions and experiences of using the JfA cat for older adults and people with dementia.
Methods:
We used a novel methodology of analysing a large volume of information that were uploaded by reviewers of the JfA cat onto online consumer review sites. Data was collected from 15 consumer websites. This provided a total of 2,445 reviews which were extracted onto Microsoft Excel. Next, all reviews were screened. 1327 reviews that contained information about use of the JfA cat for older adults and/or people with dementia were included for analysis. These were reviews that contained terms relating to “older adults”, “dementia”, and “institutional care”, and were published in the English language. Descriptive statistics was used to characterize available demographic information, and textual data was qualitatively analysed using inductive content analysis.
Results:
Most reviews were derived from consumer sites in the United States, and most reviewers were family members of users (i.e. older adults and people with dementia). Based on the qualitative content analysis, five key themes were generated. Findings revealed that reviewers had prior expectations of the JfA cat, which included circumstantial reasons that prompted them to purchase this technology. Their perceptions evolved after using the technology, where most reported positive perceptions about their appearance and interactive features. The use of the JfA cat was also identified as a meaningful activity, as it provided opportunities for older adults and people with dementia to care for it and incorporated it into their routine. Finally, reviewers also shared about the impacts of JfA cat, and practicalities related to its use.
Conclusions:
This study provides important knowledge which can help researchers, robot developers and clinicians understand the viability of using low-cost robotic pets to benefit older adults and people with dementia. Future research should consider evaluating design preferences for robotic pets, and compare the effects of low-cost robotic pets to other more technologically advanced robotic pets.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.