Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Mar 29, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 15, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Blood Glucose Monitoring and Sharing Amongst People With Diabetes and Their Facilitators: Cross-sectional Study of Methods and Practices

Jamal A, Tharkar S, Babaier WS, Alsomali SF, Alsulayhim AS, Alayuni MA, Aldakheel NA, Al-Osaimi SS, Alshehri N, Batais M

Blood Glucose Monitoring and Sharing Amongst People With Diabetes and Their Facilitators: Cross-sectional Study of Methods and Practices

JMIR Diabetes 2021;6(4):e29178

DOI: 10.2196/29178

PMID: 34704954

PMCID: 8581747

Blood glucose monitoring and sharing: methods, practices and their facilitators among people with Diabetes

  • Amr Jamal; 
  • Shabana Tharkar; 
  • Weam Saleh Babaier; 
  • Shrooq Faisal Alsomali; 
  • -Allulu Saad Alsulayhim; 
  • Monera Abdulkareem Alayuni; 
  • Nada Abdulaziz Aldakheel; 
  • Safa Sultan Al-Osaimi; 
  • Norah Alshehri; 
  • Mohammed Batais

ABSTRACT

Background:

The last two decades have seen a burgeoning rise in the prevalence of diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Reaching epidemic proportions, women and adolescents in urban areas are the most affected. Self-management programs and intervention policies are being prioritized for diabetes control.

Objective:

To determine the determinants of and investigate the types of methods used for sharing the results of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) among insulin users.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 203 patients attending primary care clinics of a tertiary care center. The questionnaire included demographic details and information related to measuring, recording, and sharing SMBG results. Descriptive and inferential statistics were reported.

Results:

The prevalence of monitoring was 95% (193/203; 95%), recording was 76%(147/193; 76.2%) and sharing 79%(117/147; 79.6%).. Of these, only 72% performed daily monitoring. But the overall prevalence of sharing SMBG results in the entire sample was 57.6% only (117/203;57.6%). Almost 55.6% used paper-based materials like notebooks and paper for recording, while the rest used digital devices like laptops and smartphones. A shift towards the use of digital devices and smart applications was observed in the younger population. The digitally recorded blood glucose measurements were being shared thrice more often than recordings made in paper or notebook (OR=2.8; P =.01) Older patients (OR= 2.3; P = .02), lesser formal education, being married (OR=4.2; P= <.001), smaller family size (OR= 2.6; P =.01), having type 2 diabetes ( OR=4.1; P= <.002), and presence of any comorbid condition (OR=2.6; P= .01) were associated with higher Odds of using paper-based methods for sharing.

Conclusions:

Diabetes self-management programs can incorporate the use of digital technology in training sessions. The older diabetic individuals may be the center of focus for such training programs and reinforce improved monitoring and sharing practices using smart devices. Digital literacy and its applications in healthcare may enhance SMBG practices resulting in better diabetes control.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jamal A, Tharkar S, Babaier WS, Alsomali SF, Alsulayhim AS, Alayuni MA, Aldakheel NA, Al-Osaimi SS, Alshehri N, Batais M

Blood Glucose Monitoring and Sharing Amongst People With Diabetes and Their Facilitators: Cross-sectional Study of Methods and Practices

JMIR Diabetes 2021;6(4):e29178

DOI: 10.2196/29178

PMID: 34704954

PMCID: 8581747

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.