Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 29, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 28, 2021 - May 23, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 22, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Internet Search Results for Older Adult Physical Activity Guidelines: Scoping Review

Harden SM, Murphy A, Ratliff K, Balis LE

Internet Search Results for Older Adult Physical Activity Guidelines: Scoping Review

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(1):e29153

DOI: 10.2196/29153

PMID: 35023847

PMCID: 8796040

Internet Search Results for Older Adult Physical Activity Guidelines: Scoping Review

  • Samantha M Harden; 
  • Anna Murphy; 
  • Kathryn Ratliff; 
  • Laura E Balis

Background:

Older adults seek health-related information through casual internet searches. Yet, researchers focus on peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations as primary dissemination strategies. Representatives of mass media are alerted (passive diffusion) of new studies or recommendations, but the veracity of the information shared is not often analyzed, and when it is, the analysis is often not comprehensive. However, most older adults do not have access to peer-reviewed journal articles or paid subscription services for more reputable media outlets.

Objective:

We aimed to determine what information was readily available (ie, open access) to older adults who may casually search the internet for physical activity recommendations.

Methods:

We performed a 6-part scoping review to determine the research question and available evidence, and extract data within open-access top hits using popular online search engines. Results were categorized by a dissemination model that has categories of sources, channels, audience, and messages.

Results:

After the iterative search process, 92 unique articles were included and coded. Only 5 (5%) cited physical activity guidelines, and most were coded as promoting healthy aging (82/92, 89%) and positive framing (84/92, 91%). Most articles were posed as educational, but the authors’ credentials were rarely reported (ie, 22% of the time). Muscle strengthening and balance components of the physical activity guidelines for older adults were rarely reported (72/92, 78% and 80/92, 87%, respectively) or inaccurately reported (3/92, 3% and 3/92, 3%, respectively).

Conclusions:

Inconsistent messages lead to mistrust of science and public health representatives. This work highlights the lack of evidence within existing open-access resources. Further efforts are needed to ensure evidence-based public health messages are in the sources and channels older adults are using to inform their knowledge and behaviors.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Harden SM, Murphy A, Ratliff K, Balis LE

Internet Search Results for Older Adult Physical Activity Guidelines: Scoping Review

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(1):e29153

DOI: 10.2196/29153

PMID: 35023847

PMCID: 8796040

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.