Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 20, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 16, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Web-Based Personalized Nutrition Advice for Adults Using the eNutri Web App: Evidence From the EatWellUK Randomized Controlled Trial

Zenun Franco R, Fallaize R, Weech M, Hwang F, Lovegrove JA

Effectiveness of Web-Based Personalized Nutrition Advice for Adults Using the eNutri Web App: Evidence From the EatWellUK Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(4):e29088

DOI: 10.2196/29088

PMID: 35468093

PMCID: 9154737

Effectiveness of Online Personalised Nutrition Advice for Adults using the eNutri web app: Evidence from the EatWellUK Randomised Control Trial

  • Rodrigo Zenun Franco; 
  • Rosalind Fallaize; 
  • Michelle Weech; 
  • Faustina Hwang; 
  • Julie A Lovegrove

ABSTRACT

Background:

Nutrition-related apps have great potential to influence eating behaviours and improve adherence to healthy eating guidelines. In addition, when personalised advice is delivered automatically, these apps enable the provision of individual support at-scale with relatively low-cost.

Objective:

To investigate the effectiveness of a mobile web application (eNutri), capable of delivering automated personalised nutrition (PN) advice, in increasing diet quality, relative to general population food-based dietary guidelines.

Methods:

UK adults (aged > 18 years) were randomised to (i) PN advice or (ii) control advice (standard healthy eating guidelines) in a 12-week controlled, parallel, single-blinded, dietary intervention, which was delivered online. Uniquely, PN advice was derived according to an 11-item modified US Alternative Healthy Eating Index (m-AHEI) to align with UK dietary and nutritional recommendations. The primary outcome was change in diet quality (m-AHEI) at 12 weeks. Dietary intake was determined using the eNutri Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Participant surveys to evaluate the PN report, and longer-term impact of the PN advice were deployed immediately following, and 4.6 months after completion of the study respectively.

Results:

In total, 210 participants completed at least one additional FFQ following baseline. Following exclusion of outliers with unfeasible energy or food group intakes (n=23), 96 participants were included in the PN group (43.5 years, SD 15.9; BMI 24.2 kg/m2, SD 4.4) and 91 in the control (42.8 years, SD 14.0; BMI 24.8 kg/m2, SD 4.4). The average interval between FFQs was 10.8 weeks. A significant increase in the overall m-AHEI score of 3.5 out of 100 (CI 95%: 1.19-5.78), equivalent to an increase of 6.1%, was observed in the PN group, compared with the control group (P = .003). The m-AHEI components ‘nuts and legumes’ and ‘red and processed meat’ also improved significantly more in the PN group (P’s = 0.04). At follow-up (mean 5.9 months after intervention), 64.3% of PN participants agreed that the advice from the app had prompted them to change their eating/drinking habits, and that they were still following some (‘any’) of the advice.

Conclusions:

This result supports the hypothesis that the eNutri app is an effective online tool for the automated delivery of PN advice in UK data. Our data also demonstrate the potential of our app to improve short-term diet quality and engagement in healthy eating behaviours, when compared with standard healthy eating guidelines. Clinical Trial: The EatWellUK study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03250858)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zenun Franco R, Fallaize R, Weech M, Hwang F, Lovegrove JA

Effectiveness of Web-Based Personalized Nutrition Advice for Adults Using the eNutri Web App: Evidence From the EatWellUK Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(4):e29088

DOI: 10.2196/29088

PMID: 35468093

PMCID: 9154737

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.