Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 18, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 21, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

General Practitioners’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Systems: Interview Study

Buck C, Doctor E, Hennrich J, Jöhnk J, Eymann T

General Practitioners’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Systems: Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e28916

DOI: 10.2196/28916

PMID: 35084342

PMCID: 8832268

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners’ Attitudes Towards AI-Enabled Systems

  • Christoph Buck; 
  • Eileen Doctor; 
  • Jasmin Hennrich; 
  • Jan Jöhnk; 
  • Torsten Eymann

ABSTRACT

Background:

General practitioners (GPs) take care of a large number of patients with various diseases in very short timeframes under high uncertainty. Thus, artificial intelli-gence (AI) is a promising and time-saving solution that may increase the quality of care.

Objective:

This study seeks to understand GPs' attitudes towards AI solutions in medical diagnosis.

Methods:

We interviewed 18 GPs from Germany between March and May 2020 to identify determinants of GPs' attitudes towards AI solutions in diagnosis. By analyzing the interview transcripts, we identified 307 open codes which we then further struc-tured to derive relevant attitude determinants.

Results:

We merged the open codes into 21 concepts and finally into five categories: (1) concerns, (2) expectations, (3) environmental influences, (4) individual characteristics, and (5) minimum requirements of AI. Concerns include all doubts and fears of the interviewees concerning AI solutions. Expectations reflect GPs' thoughts and beliefs about expected benefits and limitations of AI solutions regarding GP care. Environmental influences include influences resulting from an evolving working environment, key stakeholders' perspectives and opinions, the available IT hardware and software resources, and the media environment. Individual characteristics are determinants that describe a physician as a person, including character traits, demographic specifics, and knowledge. Besides, the interviews also revealed minimum requirements of AI, which are preconditions that must be met for GPs to contemplate using AI. Moreover, we identified relationships between these categories, which we conflate in our proposed model.

Conclusions:

This study provides a thorough understanding of the perspective of future users of AI solutions in primary care and lays the foundation for successful market penetration. We contribute to the research stream of analyzing and designing socio-technical systems and the literature on attitude towards technology and practice by fostering the understanding of GPs and their attitude on AI solutions. Our findings provide relevant information to technology developers as well as policy makers and stakeholder institutions of GP care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Buck C, Doctor E, Hennrich J, Jöhnk J, Eymann T

General Practitioners’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Systems: Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e28916

DOI: 10.2196/28916

PMID: 35084342

PMCID: 8832268

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.