Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Mar 17, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 30, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A secondary exploratory analysis of Physical Activity in COPD Patients Comparing Conventional and Web Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Is the Level of Supervision Important?
ABSTRACT
Background:
Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) increases exercise capacity, with less clear evidence for Physical Activity (PA).The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends at least 150-300 minutes of moderate intensity or 75-150 of vigorous intensity aerobic physical activity per week to reduce the risks of chronic disease.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of conventional PR versus web-based PR with respect to changes in PA.
Methods:
Patients with COPD were randomised to either conventional PR classes (n=51) or a web-based PR programme (n=52) for 7 weeks in a feasibility study. Accelerometers (Sensewear®) were worn pre and post intervention, PA was measured as steps/day and mean bouts of moderate activity for ≥2, ≥5, ≥10 and ≥20 mins. Measures were derived for patients with ≥8 hrs of data/day for ≥4 days using R language statistical software. Variables were explored to examine relationships with bouts of activity.
Results:
Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Complete PA data was available for web (n=20) and conventional (n=34) groups. The web group demonstrated a non-significant increase in steps/24hr which comprised mainly of short bouts of MVPA when compared with conventional PR (P=.2). The conventional group increased 20 min bouts of PA by 49.1% although this was not statistically significant (P=.07). At baseline, age (r =-0.21, P=.043), BMI (r=-0.311, P=.004) and FEV1% predicted (r=-0.248, P=.048) were significantly correlated with 10 min bouts of PA, however post intervention this was not observed.
Conclusions:
The analysis detected a non-statistically significant difference in the pattern of PA between conventional and web-based PR groups, conventional PR being associated with an increase in 20 min bouts whilst the web group demonstrated an increase in steps/24hr. There appears to be a differing response emerging between the two interventions. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN03142263
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.