Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Mar 16, 2021
Date Accepted: Oct 10, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Oct 13, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinician Perspectives on Unmet Needs for Mobile Technology Among Hospitalists: Workflow Analysis Based on Semistructured Interviews

Savoy A, Saleem J, Barker B, Patel H, Kara A

Clinician Perspectives on Unmet Needs for Mobile Technology Among Hospitalists: Workflow Analysis Based on Semistructured Interviews

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e28783

DOI: 10.2196/28783

PMID: 34643530

PMCID: 8767475

​Mobile technology for hospitalists: Clinician perspectives and unmet needs from a workflow analysis

  • April Savoy; 
  • Jason Saleem; 
  • Barry Barker; 
  • Himalaya Patel; 
  • Areeba Kara

ABSTRACT

Background:

The hospitalist workday is cognitively demanding and dominated by activities away from patients’ bedside. While mobile technologies are offered as solutions, clinicians report lower expectations of mobile technology after actual use.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to better understand opportunities for integrating mobile technology and applications (“apps”) into hospitalists’ workflows. We aimed to identify difficult tasks and contextual factors that introduce inefficiencies and characterize hospitalists’ perspectives on mobile technology and apps.

Methods:

We conducted a workflow analysis based on semi-structured interviews. At a Midwestern US medical center, we recruited physicians and nurse practitioners from hospitalist and inpatient teaching teams and internal medicine residents. Interviews focused on tasks perceived as frequent, redundant, and difficult. Also, participants were asked to describe opportunities for mobile technology interventions. We analyzed contributing factors, impacted workflows, and mobile app ideas.

Results:

Over three months, we interviewed twelve hospitalists. Participants collectively identified chart reviews, orders, and documentation as the most frequent, redundant, and difficult tasks. Based on those tasks, the intake, discharge, and rounding workflows were characterized as difficult and inefficient. Difficulty was associated with a lack of access to EHRs at bedside. Contributing factors for inefficiencies were poor usability and inconsistent availability of health information technology combined with organizational policies. Participants thought mobile apps designed to improve team communications would be most beneficial. Based on our analysis, mobile apps focused on data entry and presentation supporting specific tasks should also be prioritized.

Conclusions:

Based on our results, there are prioritized opportunities for mobile technology to decrease difficulty and increase efficiency of hospitalists’ workflows. Mobile technology and task-specific mobile apps with enhanced usability could decrease over-reliance on hospitalists’ memory and fragmentation of clinical tasks across locations. This study informs design and implementation processes of future health information technologies to improve continuity in hospital-based medicine.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Savoy A, Saleem J, Barker B, Patel H, Kara A

Clinician Perspectives on Unmet Needs for Mobile Technology Among Hospitalists: Workflow Analysis Based on Semistructured Interviews

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e28783

DOI: 10.2196/28783

PMID: 34643530

PMCID: 8767475

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.