Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Mar 14, 2021
Date Accepted: Oct 11, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing International Experiences With Electronic Health Records Among Emergency Medicine Physicians in the United States and Norway: Semistructured Interview Study

Palmer G, Crenner C

Comparing International Experiences With Electronic Health Records Among Emergency Medicine Physicians in the United States and Norway: Semistructured Interview Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e28762

DOI: 10.2196/28762

PMID: 34994702

PMCID: 8783275

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Emergency Physician Experiences with Electronic Health Records in the United States and Norway: Qualitative Study

  • Gracie Palmer; 
  • Christopher Crenner

ABSTRACT

Background:

Physician attitudes regarding Electronic Health Records (EHR) are widely recognized. It has also been established that both human and technologic components contribute to user satisfaction. This study compares emergency physician EHR experiences between the United States and Norway.

Objective:

The primary outcome analyzes individual perceptions of Health Information Technology (HIT). It examines independent variables that influence overall user experience within a socio-political-technical context. Fundamental differences between nations will also be addressed.

Methods:

This exploratory study used semi-structured, respondent-driven, in-depth interviews (n=12) that were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted using grounded theory and ethnography.

Results:

Potential benefits and disadvantages were acknowledged by all physicians. Both cohorts reported increased clerical burden. Overall, Norwegians were more likely to report positive EHR experiences while American dissatisfaction was disproportionally high. US frustrations were multifactorial all resulting with similar consequences- generation of excessive data with little clinical value. They also felt EHRs prioritized capital gain over healthcare optimization. Norwegian complaints mainly involved technology dysfunction. The initiative “One Patient, One Record” (Én innbygger - én journal) will soon result in a single EHR provider (Epic Systems) for the entire nation. Currently, all EHRs in Norway are connected to a national health information exchange (HIE) platform known as the “core journal” (Kjernejouralen) which contains prescription and critical medical information to providers across the country. US physicians expressed interest in having a version of this tool as they often cannot obtain outside patient records.

Conclusions:

Despite differences spanning geographic, organizational, and cultural boundaries much is to be learned by direct comparison of individual experiences. This study suggests policy, regulation, and culture may have greater influence on overall user experience rather than technology itself. Global EHR optimization requires additional investigation and these results help establish foundation for future research.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Palmer G, Crenner C

Comparing International Experiences With Electronic Health Records Among Emergency Medicine Physicians in the United States and Norway: Semistructured Interview Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(1):e28762

DOI: 10.2196/28762

PMID: 34994702

PMCID: 8783275

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.