Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Mar 11, 2021
Date Accepted: May 27, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 28, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Telerehabilitation for Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Evaluation

Wickerson L, Helm D, Gottesman C, Rozenberg D, Singer LG, Keshavjee S, Sidhu A

Telerehabilitation for Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Evaluation

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(6):e28708

DOI: 10.2196/28708

PMID: 34048354

PMCID: 8213059

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Tele-rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience of a large lung transplant centre

  • Lisa Wickerson; 
  • Denise Helm; 
  • Chaya Gottesman; 
  • Dmitry Rozenberg; 
  • Lianne G. Singer; 
  • Shaf Keshavjee; 
  • Aman Sidhu

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid shift from centre-based to tele-rehabilitation. Clinical experience with this delivery model on a large scale has not been described.

Objective:

Describe usage and satisfaction of healthcare providers and lung transplant candidates and recipients and functional outcomes.

Methods:

A program evaluation of providers and lung transplant candidates and recipients who used a web-based, remote monitoring App for a least four weeks between March 16th and September 1st 2020. Within-subjects analysis was performed for physical activity and exercise volumes.

Results:

78 candidates and 33 recipients were included (50% male, 58 ± 12 years, 50% interstitial lung disease 31% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). 83% of candidates agreed the App helped prepare them for surgery and 85% of recipients found the App helpful to their self-recovery. Physiotherapists reported satisfaction using the App to maintain communication, provide virtual support and monitor remotely. Patients accessed the App’s exercise card (278 views), exercise video (116 views) and guidelines for exercising after transplant (89 views). 26 candidates used a treadmill that increased in duration (16-22mins, P=.002) but not speed (1.7-1.75mph, P=.31). Quadriceps weight (lbs) for leg extension did not change (3.5[2.4-5] vs. 4.3[3-5] P=.08, n=37). Nine recipients used a treadmill that increased in speed (1.9 – 2.7mph, P=.003) up to three months post-transplant. Quadriceps weight (lbs) increased (3[0-3] vs. 5[3.8-6.5] P<.001, n=15). Three month post-transplant 6-minute walk distance was 62% ± 18% predicted (n=8).

Conclusions:

We were able to provide tele-rehabilitation despite challenges around exercise equipment. This early experience will inform the development of a robust and equitable tele-rehabilitation model beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wickerson L, Helm D, Gottesman C, Rozenberg D, Singer LG, Keshavjee S, Sidhu A

Telerehabilitation for Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Evaluation

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(6):e28708

DOI: 10.2196/28708

PMID: 34048354

PMCID: 8213059

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.