Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Jul 13, 2021)

Date Submitted: Mar 8, 2021

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patient perspectives on the use of digital health services at a multi-site hospital in North-West London: a quantitative content analysis

  • Jackie van Dael; 
  • Ana Luisa Neves; 
  • Annabelle Painter; 
  • Patrick Bachtiger; 
  • Niki O'Brien; 
  • Clarissa Gardner; 
  • Jennifer K Quint; 
  • Alex Adamson; 
  • Nicholas S Peters; 
  • Ara Darzi; 
  • Saira Ghafur

ABSTRACT

Background:

Following a large increase in the adoption of digital health amidst the COVID-19 crisis, there is increasing policy interest in the longer-term implementation of digital health services. Yet, there is still much unknown about the inherent quality of remote digital care, and research on patient perspectives remains comparatively small. Widespread usage amidst COVID-19 presents an important opportunity to better understand patients’ first-hand experiences with using these technologies.

Objective:

This study examined patients’ perspectives on main benefits and concerns with using digital health services in a large multi-site teaching hospital in North-West London during the COVID-19 crisis.

Methods:

Qualitative data was obtained from a larger questionnaire conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic on Care Information Exchange, which represents the largest patient-facing electronic health records in the English National Health Service. All responses were analysed using the framework analysis method. Quantitative content analysis was performed by mapping frequencies of reported themes across the respondent population.

Results:

Of all 6,766 respondents, 25.1% reported to have no concerns with digital health services, compared to 3.0% reporting no benefits. Reported benefits included: ease of access (37.1%), feeling empowered and informed (23.2%), improved timeliness of access and treatment (18.6%), healthcare capacity (11.5%), and care continuity amidst COVID-19 (7.4%). In contrast, reported concerns included issues around data security and privacy (17.5%), clinical uncertainty (17.0%), impact on patient-doctor relationship (11.9%), inequity in access and use (11.8%), misunderstanding health information (6.3%), and digital maturity (3.8%).

Conclusions:

Patients report many benefits with digital health services beyond immediate COVID-19 support, including improved access, timeliness, and enhanced healthcare capacity. Yet, some concerns remain, including some less-addressed problems such as the more fundamental impacts on clinical effectiveness and the patient-doctor relationship. These large-scale and patient-driven insights can inform main areas to be addressed in future research and practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

van Dael J, Neves AL, Painter A, Bachtiger P, O'Brien N, Gardner C, Quint JK, Adamson A, Peters NS, Darzi A, Ghafur S

Patient perspectives on the use of digital health services at a multi-site hospital in North-West London: a quantitative content analysis

JMIR Preprints. 08/03/2021:28603

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.28603

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28603

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.