Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Mar 4, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 4, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining How Internet Users Trust and Access Electronic Health Record Patient Portals: Survey Study

Yin R, Law K, Neyens D

Examining How Internet Users Trust and Access Electronic Health Record Patient Portals: Survey Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(3):e28501

DOI: 10.2196/28501

PMID: 34546182

PMCID: 8493465

Examining how Internet Users Trust and Access Electronic Health Records Patient Portals: Survey Study

  • Rong Yin; 
  • Katherine Law; 
  • David Neyens

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic Health Records (EHR) patient portals are designed to provide medical health records to patients. Using EHR portal is expected to contribute to positive health outcomes as well as facilitating patient-provider communication.

Objective:

Our objective was to examine how portal users report using their portals as well as factors associated with obtaining health information online. We also examined what features were desired by users, how portal users accessed health information online, and impact users’ trust in their patient portal.

Methods:

An online survey study was conducted using Amazon Mechanical Turk. All the participants were adults in the US who used patient portals. The survey included questions asking how the participants used their portals, what factors acted as barriers to using their portals, and how they used and trusted other online health information source as well as their portals. A logistic regression model was used to examine what factors influenced a participant’s trust in their portals. Additionally, desired features and design characteristics were evaluated to support the design of future portals.

Results:

There were 394 participants who completed the survey. The majority of the participants were less than 35 years old (53.8%), with 36.3% between 35 and 55 years old and 9.9% were over 55 years-old. Women accounted for 48.5% of the survey participants. More than 78% of the participants reported using portals at least monthly. The most common portal features used included those related to viewing lab results, making appointments, and paying bills. Participants reported barriers to portal use including data security and limited access to the internet. The results of a logistic regression model used to predict the trust in their portal suggests that those who were comfortable using their portal (Odd Ratio (OR) 7.97, 95% CI 1.11 to 57.32), thought their portal was easy to use (OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.12 to 48.84), and were frequent internet users (OR 43.72, 95% CI 1.83 to 1046.43) were more likely to trust their portal. Those who reported that the portals were important in managing their health (OR 28.13, 95% CI 5.31 to 148.85) and those who reported their portal was a valuable part in their health care (OR 6.75, 95% CI 1.51 to 30.11) were also more likely to trust their portal.

Conclusions:

This study provided insights into the use of portals by internet users, including the desired features of portals, what factors impact users’ trust on portals and barriers in using portals. Designing usable portals may be the most effective approach to improve trust in the portals themselves. The features and usability design of portals are critical factor that contribute to users trust on portals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yin R, Law K, Neyens D

Examining How Internet Users Trust and Access Electronic Health Record Patient Portals: Survey Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(3):e28501

DOI: 10.2196/28501

PMID: 34546182

PMCID: 8493465

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.