Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Jun 01, 2021)

Date Submitted: Mar 4, 2021

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Fully Automatic Deep Learning System for L3 Slice Selection and Body Composition Assessment on Abdominal Computed Tomography.

  • Jiyeon Ha; 
  • Taeyong Park; 
  • Hong-Kyu Kim; 
  • Youngbin Shin; 
  • Yousun Ko; 
  • Dong Wook Kim; 
  • Yu Sub Sung; 
  • Jiwoo Lee; 
  • Su Jung Ham; 
  • Seungwoo Khang; 
  • Heeryeol Jeong; 
  • Kyoyeong Koo; 
  • Jeongjin Lee; 
  • Kyung Won Kim

ABSTRACT

Background:

As sarcopenia research has been gaining emphasis, the need for quantification of abdominal muscle on computed tomography (CT) is increasing. Thus, a fully automated system to select L3 slice and segment muscle in an end-to-end manner is demanding.

Objective:

We aimed to develop a deep learning model (DLM) to select the L3 slice with consideration of anatomic variations and to segment cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of abdominal muscle and fat.

Methods:

Our DLM, named L3SEG-net, was composed of a YOLOv3-based algorithm for selecting the L3 slice and a fully convolutional network (FCN)-based algorithm for segmentation. The YOLOv3-based algorithm was developed via supervised learning using a training dataset (n=922), and the FCN-based algorithm was transferred from prior work. Our L3SEG-net was validated with internal (n=496) and external validation (n=586) datasets. L3 slice selection accuracy was evaluated by the distance difference between ground truths and DLM-derived results. Technical success for L3 slice selection was defined when the distance difference was <10 mm. Overall segmentation accuracy was evaluated by CSA error. The influence of anatomic variations on DLM performance was evaluated.

Results:

In the internal and external validation datasets, the accuracy of automatic L3 slice selection was high, with mean distance differences of 3.7±8.4 mm and 4.1±8.3 mm, respectively, and with technical success rates of 93.1% and 92.3%, respectively. However, in the subgroup analysis of anatomic variations, the L3 slice selection accuracy decreased, with distance differences of 12.4±15.4 mm and 12.1±14.6 mm, respectively, and with technical success rates of 67.2% and 67.9%, respectively. The overall segmentation accuracy of abdominal muscle areas was excellent regardless of anatomic variation, with the CSA errors of 1.38–3.10 cm2.

Conclusions:

A fully automatic system was developed for the selection of an exact axial CT slice at the L3 vertebral level and the segmentation of abdominal muscle areas.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ha J, Park T, Kim HK, Shin Y, Ko Y, Kim DW, Sung YS, Lee J, Ham SJ, Khang S, Jeong H, Koo K, Lee J, Kim KW

A Fully Automatic Deep Learning System for L3 Slice Selection and Body Composition Assessment on Abdominal Computed Tomography.

JMIR Preprints. 04/03/2021:28399

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.28399

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28399

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.