Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Mar 3, 2021
Date Accepted: May 16, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 12, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study

Arean P, Mata-Greve F, Johnson M, Pullmann M, Griffith Fillipo I, Comtois K

Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(8):e28360

DOI: 10.2196/28360

PMID: 34081592

PMCID: 8354319

Mental Health and Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools among Essential Workers and Unemployed during COVID-19: A Remote Survey Study

  • Patricia Arean; 
  • Felicia Mata-Greve; 
  • Morgan Johnson; 
  • Michael Pullmann; 
  • Isabell Griffith Fillipo; 
  • Katherine Comtois

ABSTRACT

Background:

COVID-19 has created serious mental health consequences for people who are designated as essential workers or have become unemployed as a result of the pandemic.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of psychiatric distress in these two sectors of the community and understand how digital mental health tools (DMHT) have been used to cope with the mental health consequences of the pandemic.

Methods:

Two thousand people were recruited from an online research community (Prolific) and completed a one-time survey about mental health symptoms, digital mental health use and preferred digital mental health features.

Results:

The final sample included 1,987 United States residents that identified as either an essential worker or someone who was unemployed due to COVID-19. Approximately 74.9% (1479/1987) of the sample endorsed at least one of the following: 1) probable depression, 2) anxiety, 3) risk for substance use disorder, 4) suicidal behaviors, 5) history of suicide attempt. Only 14.2% (277/1957) of the entire contributing sample reported using a DMHT to cope with stress associated with COVID-19. Of the 1,470 responding distressed individuals, 236 (16.1%) used a DMHT to cope with COVID-19 stress. Majority of the sample did not use a DMHT to cope (1710/1957, 85.9%). Compared to essential workers, those who were unemployed reported more concern regarding cost (χ21=19.41, P<.001) and had not considered using one (χ21=6.84, P=.009) As predicted, essential workers were more likely to report user burden concerns with DMHTs than participants unemployed due to COVID-19 (t214.5 = 3.20, P=<.002). All participants reported that mindfulness tools, information or education, positive psychology, and links to mental health resources were the most important features they would seek in a DMHT.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the remaining challenge hindering access to mental health resources, even under relaxed reimbursement rates for DMHTs under COVID-19. It also highlights what consumers (i.e., in this case essential workers and those unemployed by COVID-19) believe should be included in DMHTs and the overall role consumers see DMHTs playing in coping with prolonged situational stress.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Arean P, Mata-Greve F, Johnson M, Pullmann M, Griffith Fillipo I, Comtois K

Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(8):e28360

DOI: 10.2196/28360

PMID: 34081592

PMCID: 8354319

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.