Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Feb 27, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 28, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on eHealth Support in Colorectal Cancer Survivorship: Qualitative Interview Study

Huseboe AML

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on eHealth Support in Colorectal Cancer Survivorship: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Cancer 2021;7(3):e28279

DOI: 10.2196/28279

PMID: 34491210

PMCID: 8456333

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on eHealth Support in Colorectal Cancer Survivorship: A Qualitative Interview Study

  • Anne Marie Lunde Huseboe

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

eHealth interventions may represent a way forward in following up colorectal cancer (CRC) patients’ post-hospital discharge, to support the patients in coping with the illness, and to strengthen their self-management and increase their quality of life. By involving the end users of eHealth in co-creation processes when designing eHealth solutions, an acceptable and relevant product can be secured. Stakeholders’ perspectives could aid the closing of the gap between research-developed products and the implementation of eHealth services in real-life scenarios.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to explore the views of CRC patients, their informal carers and health care professionals on information technology and the design of eHealth support in CRC care.

Methods:

A qualitative, explorative design was applied to perform 30 semi-structured individual interviews with thirteen CRC patients, nine informal carers and nine health care professionals recruited via a gastro-surgical ward at a university hospital in south-western Norway. A semi-structured interview guide was used for data collection, and data was analyzed by systematic text condensation.

Results:

Participants described the diverse experiences of CRC patients seeking information online. Age and technology competence were highlighted as influencers of the use of information technology. Patients rarely received advice from health care professionals about relevant and secure websites containing information on CRC diagnosis and treatments. Features of desired eHealth interventions in following up CRC patients were patient education, monitoring of health, and communication with health care professionals.

Conclusions:

Several elements affect the activities of CRC patients seeking health information. Age, inexperience of computer technology, and lack of facility in accessing online resources of health information may reduce the CRC patient’s ability to engage in decision-making processes regarding illness and treatment. An eHealth service for CRC patients should may comprise features for information, education and support for self-management, and should aim to be individually adapted to the patient’s age and technology competence. Involving the end users of eHealth services is necessary to ensure tailored services of high quality that are perceived as user-friendly and relevant to the end-users. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Huseboe AML

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on eHealth Support in Colorectal Cancer Survivorship: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Cancer 2021;7(3):e28279

DOI: 10.2196/28279

PMID: 34491210

PMCID: 8456333

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.