Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 24, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 21, 2021
Date Accepted: Jun 14, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Using a Smartphone Application for the Accurate and Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Anterior Intracranial Arterial Occlusion: Usability Study

Komatsu T, Sakai K, Iguchi Y, Takao H, Ishibashi T, Murayama Y

Using a Smartphone Application for the Accurate and Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Anterior Intracranial Arterial Occlusion: Usability Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(8):e28192

DOI: 10.2196/28192

PMID: 34448716

PMCID: 8433940

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Smartphone Application can Yield Accurate and Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Anterior Intracranial Arterial Occlusion

  • Teppei Komatsu; 
  • Kenichiro Sakai; 
  • Yasuyuki Iguchi; 
  • Hiroyuki Takao; 
  • Toshihiro Ishibashi; 
  • Yuichi Murayama

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telestroke have rapidly developed as a way to reach out to patients who are eligible for the administration of reperfusion therapy.

Objective:

The aim is to investigate if vascular neurologists can make a quick and precise diagnosis of an intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) using a smartphone as well as a hospital desktop personal computer (PC) monitor.

Methods:

MRIs of acute ischemic stroke consecutive 108 patients with a territory of middle cerebral artery within 24 hours of onset were retrospectively enrolled. A LVO was estimated at the internal carotid artery and the middle cerebral artery (M1, M2 and M3). After blinding all clinical information, two vascular neurologists evaluated the presence or absence of LVO on MRA and FLAIR by using a smartphone (Smartphone-LVO decision) and a hospital desktop PC monitor (PC-LVO decision), independently. In order to analyze inter-device variability comparisons (Smartphone-LVO decision and PC-LVO decision) κ statistics were conducted. Image interpretation times between a Smartphone-LVO decision and a PC-LVO decision were compared.

Results:

Regarding the presence or absence of arterial occlusion, Smartphone-LVO decision broadly agreed with PC-LVO decision (vascular neurologist 1, κ=0.94, p<0.001; vascular neurologist 2, κ=0.89, p<0.001). Interpretation time of the Smartphone-LVO decision was similar to that of the PC-LVO decision.

Conclusions:

The smartphone application can yield an accurate diagnosis of anterior intracranial arterial occlusion patients in and outside the hospital. It should play an important role in organizing the stroke team for hyper-acute ischemic stroke.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Komatsu T, Sakai K, Iguchi Y, Takao H, Ishibashi T, Murayama Y

Using a Smartphone Application for the Accurate and Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Anterior Intracranial Arterial Occlusion: Usability Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(8):e28192

DOI: 10.2196/28192

PMID: 34448716

PMCID: 8433940

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.