Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Feb 23, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 17, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 25, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

How Identification With the Social Environment and With the Government Guide the Use of the Official COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Three Quantitative Survey Studies

Scholl A, Sassenberg K

How Identification With the Social Environment and With the Government Guide the Use of the Official COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Three Quantitative Survey Studies

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(11):e28146

DOI: 10.2196/28146

PMID: 34662289

PMCID: 8614392

How identification with the social environment and with the government guide the use of the official COVID-19 contact tracing app: Three quantitative survey studies

  • Annika Scholl; 
  • Kai Sassenberg

ABSTRACT

Background:

Official contact tracing apps have been implemented and recommended for use across nations to track and contain the spread of COVID-19. Such apps can be effective if people are willing to actually use them. Accordingly, many attempts are being made to motivate citizens to make use of the officially recommended apps.

Objective:

The present research sought to contribute to an understanding of the preconditions under which people are willing to use this app (i.e., their use intentions and actual use). Taking people’s social context into account, it argues that the more people identify with the beneficiaries of app use (i.e., people living close by in their social environment) and with the source recommending the app (i.e., members of the government), the more likely they will be to use the officially recommended contact tracing app.

Methods:

Before, right after, and five months after the official contact tracing app was launched in Germany, a total of 1044 people participated in three studies. Structural equation modeling tested the hypotheses, examining the same model in all studies at these critical points in time.

Results:

Across studies, both identification with the beneficiaries (people living in their social environment) and with the source recommending the app (members of the government) predicted greater intention to and actual use of the official contact tracing app. Trust in the source (members of the government) served as mediator. Other types of identification (with people in Germany or people around the world) did not explain the observed results. The findings were highly consistent across the three studies.

Conclusions:

Attempts to motivate people to use new health-technology (or potentially new measures more generally) can benefit from taking the social context into account —that is, the groups people belong to and identify with. The more important the beneficiaries and the sources of such measures are to people’s sense of the self, the more willing they will likely be to adhere to and support such measures. Clinical Trial: n.a.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Scholl A, Sassenberg K

How Identification With the Social Environment and With the Government Guide the Use of the Official COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Three Quantitative Survey Studies

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(11):e28146

DOI: 10.2196/28146

PMID: 34662289

PMCID: 8614392

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.