Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2021
Date Accepted: Oct 12, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Oct 18, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Test-Retest Reliability of Home-Based Fitness Assessments Using a Mobile App (R Plus Health) in Healthy Adults: Prospective Quantitative Study

Lin II, Chen YL, Chuang LL

Test-Retest Reliability of Home-Based Fitness Assessments Using a Mobile App (R Plus Health) in Healthy Adults: Prospective Quantitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(12):e28040

DOI: 10.2196/28040

PMID: 34657835

PMCID: 8701670

Test-Retest Reliability of Home-Based Fitness Assessments Using a Mobile Application (R Plus Health) in Healthy Adults: A Prospective Quantitative Study

  • I-I Lin; 
  • You-Lin Chen; 
  • Li-Ling Chuang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Poor physical fitness has negative impact on health conditions. More and more health-related applications (App) have emerged to reduce burden of medicine, and inconvenience of long distance. However, there were insufficient studies about home-based fitness tests on the app. Insufficient monitor of physiological signals during executing fitness assessment was noted. Therefore, we developed the fitness App incorporating all components of fitness assessments under physiological signals monitor.

Objective:

The first aim of study was to investigate the reliability of home-based fitness assessments on health mobile app in healthy adults. Secondly, we aimed to examine and compare the results of fitness assessment on the App.

Methods:

Thirty-one healthy young adults self-executed fitness assessments on the App for 2 trials in 2-3 day interval. The fitness assessments include cardiorespiratory endurance, strength, flexibility, mobility and balance tests. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed as relative reliability of fitness assessments and determined consistency between 2 trials. The standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest real difference at 90% confidence interval (SRD90), and Bland-Altman analyses were analyzed and used for agreement, sensitivity to real change, and systematic bias detection.

Results:

The relative reliability of fitness assessments was moderate to good (ICCs for raw scores= 0.8 to 0.99, for converting scores= 0.69 to 0.99). The SEM and SRD90 were 1.44 to 6.91 and 3.36 to 16.11, respectively in all fitness assessments. The 95% confidence interval of mean difference indicated no significant systematic error between 2 trials in strength, and balance tests. The Bland-Altman analyses revealed no significant systematic bias between 2 trials for all fitness assessments and few outliers. The Bland-Altman plots illustrated narrow limits of agreement for UE strength, trunk strength, and right leg stance tests, indicating good agreement between 2 trials.

Conclusions:

Home-based fitness assessments on the health mobile application were reliable and feasible. The results of fitness assessments can offer comprehensive understanding of health conditions and help to prescribe safe and suitable exercise training. Clinical Trial: ChiCTR2000030905


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lin II, Chen YL, Chuang LL

Test-Retest Reliability of Home-Based Fitness Assessments Using a Mobile App (R Plus Health) in Healthy Adults: Prospective Quantitative Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(12):e28040

DOI: 10.2196/28040

PMID: 34657835

PMCID: 8701670

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.