Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 19, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Research on exposure of residents to pesticides in The Netherlands: Study Protocol
ABSTRACT
Background:
Application of pesticides in the vicinity of homes has caused concern regarding possible health effects in residents living close by. However, the high spatiotemporal variation of pesticide levels and lack of knowledge regarding contribution of exposure routes greatly complicates exposure assessment approaches.
Objective:
To describe the study protocol of a large exposure survey in The Netherlands assessing pesticide exposure of residents living close (< 250 meters) to agricultural fields, to better understand possible routes of exposure, to develop an integrative exposure model for residential exposure, and to describe lessons learnt.
Methods:
We performed an observational study involving residents living in the vicinity of agricultural fields and residents living more than 500 meters away from any agricultural fields (controls). Residential exposures were measured both during pesticide use period (UP) after a specific application, and non-use period (NP), during 7 and 2 days, respectively. We collected environmental samples, outdoor and indoor air, dust, soil (garden, field), and personal samples (urine, hand wipes). We also collected data on spraying applications, as well as on home characteristics, participant’s demographics and food habits via questionnaires and diaries. Environmental samples were analyzed for 46 prioritized pesticides. Urine samples were measured for biomarkers of a subset of five pesticides. Alongside the field study, and by taking spray events and environmental data into account, we developed a modelling framework to estimate environmental exposure of residents to pesticides.
Results:
Our study was conducted between 2016 and 2019. We assessed 96 homes and 192 participants, including seven farmers and 28 controls. We followed 14 applications, applying 20 active ingredients. We collected ~5000 samples: 1018 air, 445 dust (224 vacuumed floor, 221 doormat), 265 soil (238 garden, 27 fields), 2485 urines samples, 112 handwipes, 91 tank mixtures.
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, this is the first study on resident’s exposure to pesticides addressing all major non-dietary exposure sources and routes (air, soil, dust). Our protocol provides insights on used sampling techniques, the wealth of data collected, developed methods, modelling framework and lessons learnt. Resources and data are open for future collaborations on this important topic.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.