Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 8, 2021
Date Accepted: May 6, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Optimization of Primary Care Among Black Americans Using Patient Portals: Qualitative Study

Ordaz OH, Croff RL, Robinson LD, Shea SA, Bowles NP

Optimization of Primary Care Among Black Americans Using Patient Portals: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27820

DOI: 10.2196/27820

PMID: 34081016

PMCID: 8212618

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Optimization of Primary Care Among Black Americans Using Patient Portals: A Qualitative Study

  • Omar H Ordaz; 
  • Raina L Croff; 
  • LaTroy D Robinson; 
  • Steven A Shea; 
  • Nicole P Bowles

ABSTRACT

Background:

The existence of lower patient portal use among Black Americans is concerning as portals have been shown to improve the control of chronic conditions that are more prevalent and deadlier in Black Americans than the rest of the population. Portal websites at their very simplest connect patients to their electronic health records and often provide tools for patients to interact with their own health information, treatment team members, and insurance companies. However, research suggests that Black American patients have greater concerns over lack of support, loss of privacy, and reduced personalization of care relative to others in the population, which results in a disparity of portal use.

Objective:

This qualitative investigation of primary care experiences of Black Americans from across the United States, who participated in remote focus groups in April and May 2020, explores the use and perceived value of patient portal websites to better understand any barriers to optimized treatment in the primary care setting.

Methods:

To qualitatively assess the experiences of Black American patients with regular access to portal websites, we performed inductive thematic analysis of eight remote focus group interviews with Black American patients aged 30-60.

Results:

Thematic analysis uncovered the following interrelated themes regarding patient portals in primary care: 1) optimization of care; 2) patient empowerment; 3) patient-provider communication; and 4) patient burden.

Conclusions:

In contrast to what has been described regarding reluctance of Black Americans to engage with patient portals, our focus groups revealed general acceptance of patient portals, which were described overwhelmingly as tools with potential for exceptional, personalized care that may even work to mitigate the unfair burden of disease for Black Americans in primary care settings. Thus, opportunities for better health care clearly exist with increased communication, experience and adoption of remote health care practices among Black Americans.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ordaz OH, Croff RL, Robinson LD, Shea SA, Bowles NP

Optimization of Primary Care Among Black Americans Using Patient Portals: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27820

DOI: 10.2196/27820

PMID: 34081016

PMCID: 8212618

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.