Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Feb 6, 2021
Date Accepted: Dec 27, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Support for Texting-Based Condom Negotiation Among Forcibly Displaced Adolescents in the Slums of Kampala, Uganda: Cross-sectional Validation of the Condom Use Negotiated Experiences Through Technology Scale

Okumu M, Logie C, Ansong D, Mwima S, Hakiza R, Newman P

Support for Texting-Based Condom Negotiation Among Forcibly Displaced Adolescents in the Slums of Kampala, Uganda: Cross-sectional Validation of the Condom Use Negotiated Experiences Through Technology Scale

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(4):e27792

DOI: 10.2196/27792

PMID: 35384852

PMCID: 9021939

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessing sexting-based condom negotiation among forcibly displaced adolescents in Kampala, Uganda: Validation of the ‘Condom use negotiated experiences through technology’ (CuNET) Scale

  • Moses Okumu; 
  • Carmen Logie; 
  • David Ansong; 
  • Simon Mwima; 
  • Robert Hakiza; 
  • Peter Newman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital sexual communication strategies (e.g., sexting) may increase adolescents’ confidence to discuss sexual health and negotiate condom use. Because few validated measures for evaluating sexting-based condom negotiation exist, this study created and examined the psychometric properties of a condom use negotiated experiences through technology (CuNET) scale.

Objective:

Examining the psychometric properties of a sexting-based condom negotiation scale.

Methods:

Using peer network sampling, 242 forcibly displaced adolescents (16-19-years) were recruited for participation. A subscale (embarrassment to negotiate condom use) of the Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale was adapted to incorporate sexting, yielding CuNET. Participants were randomly assigned to calibration and validation sub-samples to conduct exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to establish and validate the scale. CuNET measured participants’ support levels for condom negotiation via sexting by gender and associations with sexual health outcomes

Results:

Approximately 25% of respondents reported substantial support for sexting as a condom negotiation strategy. The one-factor CuNET with the validation sample showed a good fit. Adolescent girls showed significantly lower levels of support for using sexting to negotiate condom use (13.60 vs. 21.48, p=.001). Participants who used a condom in the previous three months were more likely to support condom negotiation via sexting than those who did not use condoms (5.16 vs. 2.70, p=.001).

Conclusions:

The unidimensional CuNET scale is (1) valid and reliable for forcibly displaced adolescents living in HIV hyper-endemic settlements in Kampala, (2) gender-sensitive, and (3) relevant for predicting condom use among urban displaced and refugee adolescents. Further development of this scale will enable better understandings of how adolescents are using digital tools for condom negotiation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Okumu M, Logie C, Ansong D, Mwima S, Hakiza R, Newman P

Support for Texting-Based Condom Negotiation Among Forcibly Displaced Adolescents in the Slums of Kampala, Uganda: Cross-sectional Validation of the Condom Use Negotiated Experiences Through Technology Scale

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(4):e27792

DOI: 10.2196/27792

PMID: 35384852

PMCID: 9021939

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.