Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 1, 2021
Date Accepted: Apr 11, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 27, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Validation of the Withings ScanWatch as a Wrist-Worn Reflective Pulse Oximeter: Prospective Interventional Clinical Study

Kirszenblat R, Edouard P

Validation of the Withings ScanWatch as a Wrist-Worn Reflective Pulse Oximeter: Prospective Interventional Clinical Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e27503

DOI: 10.2196/27503

PMID: 33857011

PMCID: 8078374

Validation of Withings ScanWatch as a Wrist-Worn Reflective Pulse Oximeter: Hypoxia Study

  • Romain Kirszenblat; 
  • Paul Edouard

ABSTRACT

Background:

A decrease in the pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) level is an indicator of hypoxemia that may occur in various respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). There is currently no mass-market wrist-worn SpO2 monitor meeting the medical standards for pulse oximeters.

Objective:

The main objective of this monocentric and prospective clinical study with single-blind analysis was to test and validate the accuracy of the Withings ScanWatch’s reflective pulse oximeter function to measure SpO2 levels at different stages of hypoxia. The secondary objective is to confirm the safety of this device when used as intended.

Methods:

To achieve these objectives, we included 14 healthy participants aged 23 to 39, and we induced several stable plateaus of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) ranging from 100% to 70% to mimic non-hypoxic conditions and then mild, moderate, and severe hypoxic conditions. We measured the SpO2 level with a Withings ScanWatch on each participant’s wrist and the SaO2 from blood samples with a co-oximeter, the ABL90 hemoximeter.

Results:

After removal of the inconclusive measurements, we had 275 and 244 conclusive measurements with the two ScanWatches on the participants’ right and left wrists, evenly distributed among the 3 predetermined SpO2 groups: SpO2 ≤ 80%, 80% < SpO2 ≤ 90% and 90% < SpO2. We found a strong association and a high level of agreement between the measurements collected from the devices, with a high Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of r = 0.944 and r = 0.954 on correlation plots, a low PCC of r = 0.083 (p = 0.166) and r = 0.23 (p = 0.0013) on Bland-Altman plots, and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 2.97% and 3.00% from the participants’ right and left hands, respectively.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, the Withings ScanWatches is able to measure SpO2 levels with an adequate accuracy at a clinical grade. No undesirable effects or adverse events were reported during the study. Clinical Trial: This clinical study, ”Accuracy of ScanWatch Pulse Oximeter With Profound Hypoxia” (Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT04380389), was conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practices (ISO 14155:2011, ICH guidelines) and the declaration of Helsinki after approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Laurel Heights Panel, on March 9, 2020. (NIRB: 10-00437, N Reference: 272720 I). The selected eligible participants were informed and gave their signed consent prior to enrollment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kirszenblat R, Edouard P

Validation of the Withings ScanWatch as a Wrist-Worn Reflective Pulse Oximeter: Prospective Interventional Clinical Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e27503

DOI: 10.2196/27503

PMID: 33857011

PMCID: 8078374

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.