Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Jan 22, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 22, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021
Date Accepted: Sep 13, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 30, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Viewpoints: Where are all the gay guys? Using Google Trends to Inform the Population Size Estimation and Spatial Distribution and of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men
ABSTRACT
Background:
We must triangulate data sources to understand best the spatial distribution and population size of marginalized populations to empower public health leaders to address population-specific needs. Existing population size estimation techniques are difficult and limited. Passive surveillance strategies that utilize internet and social media could enhance, validate, and triangulate these estimates.
Objective:
We explored the Google Trends platform to approximate an estimate of the spatial heterogeneity of the population distribution of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM).
Methods:
This was done by comparing the prevalence of the “gay porn” search term to the “porn” search term.
Results:
Our results suggest that most cities have a gbMSM population size between 2% and 4% of their total population, with large urban centres having higher estimates relative to rural or suburban areas.
Conclusions:
This represents nearly a doubling of sample size estimates compared to other methods, which typically find that between 2% and 4% of the male population are gbMSM. However, we note that this method is limited by unequal coverage in internet usage across Canada and differences in the frequency of porn use by gender and sexual orientation. Nevertheless, we argue that Google Trends estimates provides, for most public health planning purposes, adequate city-level estimates of gbMSM population size in regions with a high prevalence of internet access and for purposes in which a precise or narrow estimate of the population size is not required. Furthermore, it does so in less than a minute, at no cost – making it extremely timely and cost effective relative to more precise (and complex)
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.