Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Jan 14, 2021
Date Accepted: Jun 16, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Prediction Model of Anastomotic Leakage Among Esophageal Cancer Patients After Receiving an Esophagectomy: Machine Learning Approach

Zhao Z, Cheng X, Sun X, Ma S, Feng H, Bai H, Zhao L

Prediction Model of Anastomotic Leakage Among Esophageal Cancer Patients After Receiving an Esophagectomy: Machine Learning Approach

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(7):e27110

DOI: 10.2196/27110

PMID: 34313597

PMCID: 8367102

Prediction Model of Anastomotic Leakage Among Esophageal Cancer Patients After Receiving Esophagectomy: Machine Learning Approach

  • Ziran Zhao; 
  • Xi Cheng; 
  • Xiao Sun; 
  • Shanrui Ma; 
  • Hao Feng; 
  • Huijun Bai; 
  • Liang Zhao

ABSTRACT

Background:

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is an important surgical approach for esophageal cancer patients while anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication after MIE (5%-30%).

Objective:

The aim of this study is to use machine learning techniques to develop and validate a simple risk prediction panel to screen patients with emerging risk factors.

Methods:

In this machine learning risk prediction model, we used data from a retrospective study. We randomly split (9:1) the dataset using a computer algorithm into a training dataset of 639 patients and a testing dataset of 71 patients. We identified independently important diagnostic features of AL using the feature importance and correlation-based feature selection. We assessed multiple classification tools to create a multivariate risk prediction model. Internal validation of the model using the testing dataset was followed.

Results:

Final risk panel included 36 independent risk features. Of those, 10 features were significantly identified by logistic model, including aortic calcification (OR=2.77, 95% CI 1.32-5.81), abdominal dry calcification (OR=2.79, 95% CI 1.20-6.48) , forced expiratory volume (FEV) 1% (OR=0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.89); TLCO (OR=0.56, 95% CI 0.27-1.18), peripheral vascular disease (OR=4.97, 95% CI 1.44-17.07), laparoscope (OR=3.92, 95% CI 1.23-12.51), post-operative hospital length of stay (OR=1.17, 95% CI 1.13-1.21), vascular permeability activity (OR=0.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.48), incisions fat colliquation or infections (OR=4.36, 95% CI 1.86-10.21). Logistic regression offered the highest prediction quality with accuracy of 87% in the training dataset, same performance was also archived by the testing model.

Conclusions:

Our diagnostic model offers valid predictions of diagnosis of AL, assisting in anastomotic leakage prevention and treatment. It suggests screening patients’ arteriosclerosis related risks factors and continuous monitoring of perioperative hemodynamics. Our risk prediction panel will need further calibration and validation in a prospective study in multi-center settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhao Z, Cheng X, Sun X, Ma S, Feng H, Bai H, Zhao L

Prediction Model of Anastomotic Leakage Among Esophageal Cancer Patients After Receiving an Esophagectomy: Machine Learning Approach

JMIR Med Inform 2021;9(7):e27110

DOI: 10.2196/27110

PMID: 34313597

PMCID: 8367102

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.