Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jan 7, 2021
Date Accepted: Mar 28, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Older Patients’ Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study

Terp R, Kayser L, Lindhardt T

Older Patients’ Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(2):e27005

DOI: 10.2196/27005

PMID: 33988512

PMCID: 8164121

To be, or not to be user of digital technology - Older patients’ competence, preferences and attitudes: An explorative study

  • Rikke Terp; 
  • Lars Kayser; 
  • Tove Lindhardt

ABSTRACT

Background:

Malnutrition is prevalent in older persons and associated with severe consequences such as decline in functional status, increased risk of re-admission, and increased mortality. A tablet-based eHealth solution (Food’n’Go) has recently been developed and introduced in our clinic to support older patients’ involvement in the nutritional intervention during their hospitalization, thereby enhancing their awareness and motivation for choosing the right food and get a sufficient calorie and protein intake. To get full benefits from the eHealth solution, the technology should be introduced and accompanied by support, which targets the end-user’s competence level and needs.

Objective:

In this study, we aimed to explore older patients’ readiness for technology i.e. competence, preferences and attitudes towards the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), to gain an understanding of factors which may act as barriers or facilitators for their engagement with health technology.

Methods:

The study is designed as a descriptive and explorative study using triangulation of data derived from semi-structured interviews and questionnaires (The Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY)). Older hospitalized patients (age ≥ 65 years) (n=25) were included from two hospitals in Denmark.

Results:

The majority of the older patients (median age 81 years) were users of ICT (64 %). The qualitative findings revealed that their experiences of benefits related to use of ICT facilitated usage. Barriers for use of ICT were health-related challenges, limited digital literacy and low self-efficacy related to ICT use due to age-related prejudices by their relatives and themselves. The qualitative findings were also reflected in the low READHY median score on the scales within the dimensions which addresses the user’s knowledge and skills (eHLQ1:1.8; eHLQ3: 2.0), and the user experience (eHLQ6: 2.0; eHLQ7: 1.5).

Conclusions:

Older patients are potential users of ICT, but experience a variety of barriers for using eHealth. When introducing them to eHealth it is important to emphasize the possible benefits, and to offer support targeted their knowledge, skills and motivation. Clinical Trial: This study is an explorative study and the participants are not assigned to an intervention, thus the study is not registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Terp R, Kayser L, Lindhardt T

Older Patients’ Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(2):e27005

DOI: 10.2196/27005

PMID: 33988512

PMCID: 8164121

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.