Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 6, 2021
Date Accepted: May 7, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 11, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of a Self-guided Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Tool During COVID-19: Evaluation Study

Detweiler Guarino I, Cowan DR, Fellows AM, Buckey JC

Use of a Self-guided Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Tool During COVID-19: Evaluation Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(5):e26989

DOI: 10.2196/26989

PMID: 33973856

PMCID: 8168639

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Use and Acceptability of a Self-Guided Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Tool During COVID-19: An Evaluation Study

  • Isadora Detweiler Guarino; 
  • Devin R. Cowan; 
  • Abigail M. Fellows; 
  • Jay C. Buckey

ABSTRACT

Background:

Technology can help provide accessible and inexpensive behavioral health care to those in need. The Dartmouth PATH Program is a multimedia-based computerized cognitive behavioral therapy tool designed to address stress, depression, and conflict management. The program maintains anonymity and requires no identifiable information from the user (eg, e-mail address). The stress and depression modules ask users to return to the program for six weekly visits. This program was shaped into an open-access resource and grew in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective:

The primary aim was assessing the effectiveness, acceptability, and usability of a validated computer-based health program as a stand-alone therapy tool for depression, stress, and conflict management during the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective was understanding the high dropout rates associated with online behavioral programs by contrasting the use and efficacy of the program for individuals who completed one session with those who returned and completed multiple sessions. The final objective was to determine users’ levels of stress and depression and the nature of problems and triggers they reported during the pandemic.

Methods:

Acceptability and usability data were analyzed using non-parametric statistics. Self-reported stress and depression scores over time were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models. Data were collected from April through October 2020.

Results:

The usability scores showed that participants found the Mood and Stress modules usable. Ratings on an Assessment of Self-Guided Treatment questionnaire showed that participants found Mood, Stress, and Conflict modules acceptable. Symptoms of stress as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale showed a significant improvement over time (P=0.03). There was a 20% (SD 35.2, P=0.6) decrease in depression severity level between sessions 1 and 2, and a significant decrease in the depressive symptoms over all timepoints (P=0.01). Only 19% of those who completed one Mood session returned to complete additional sessions.

Conclusions:

The PATH program was well-received, and preliminary findings indicate it improves self-reported stress and depression symptom in those who complete the modules. The attrition rate was high, likely exacerbated by the anonymity which precluded sending reminders. This program has the potential to reduce symptoms of depression, stress, and conflict burden and improve the mental health of those in need. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02726061.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Detweiler Guarino I, Cowan DR, Fellows AM, Buckey JC

Use of a Self-guided Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Tool During COVID-19: Evaluation Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(5):e26989

DOI: 10.2196/26989

PMID: 33973856

PMCID: 8168639

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.