Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 6, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 30, 2020 - Feb 24, 2021
Date Accepted: Apr 8, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Models: Protocol for a Systematic Methodological Review

Huang V, Head A, Hyseni L, O'Flaherty M, Buchan I, Capewell S, Kypridemos C

Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Models: Protocol for a Systematic Methodological Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(7):e26854

DOI: 10.2196/26854

PMID: 34309577

PMCID: 8367099

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Tobacco control policy simulation models: a systematic review protocol to identify best modelling practices that enable health policymaking

  • Vincy Huang; 
  • Anna Head; 
  • Lirije Hyseni; 
  • Martin O'Flaherty; 
  • Iain Buchan; 
  • Simon Capewell; 
  • Chris Kypridemos

ABSTRACT

Background Tobacco control models are mathematical models predicting tobacco-related outcomes in defined populations. We consider policy simulation models (PSMs) as a subcategory of tobacco control models simulating the potential outcomes of tobacco control policy options. We could not identify any existing tool specifically designed to assess the quality of tobacco control models. Therefore, our systematic methodology review aims to: identify best modelling practices; highlight common pitfalls; and develop recommendations to assess the quality of tobacco control PSMs. Crucially, these recommendations can empower model users to assess the quality of current and future modelling studies, potentially leading to better tobacco policy decision making for the public. This protocol describes planned systematic review stages, paper inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and analysis methods. Methods Two reviewers searched five databases, Embase, EconLit, PsycINFO, PubMed and CINAHL Plus, to identify eligible studies published between July 2013 and August 2019. We included papers projecting tobacco-related outcomes with a focus on tobacco control policies in any population and setting. Eligible papers were independently screened by two reviewers. The data extraction form was designed and piloted to extract model structure, data sources, transparency, validation and other qualities. We will use a narrative synthesis to present the results by summarising model trends, analysing model approaches, and reporting data input and result quality. We will propose recommendations to assess the quality of tobacco control PSMs using findings from this review and related literature. Trial registration International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) number CRD42020178146.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Huang V, Head A, Hyseni L, O'Flaherty M, Buchan I, Capewell S, Kypridemos C

Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Models: Protocol for a Systematic Methodological Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(7):e26854

DOI: 10.2196/26854

PMID: 34309577

PMCID: 8367099

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.