Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Dec 19, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 15, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing Suicide Reporting in Top Newspaper Social Media Accounts in China: Content Analysis Study

Lai K, Li D, Peng H, Zhao J, He L

Assessing Suicide Reporting in Top Newspaper Social Media Accounts in China: Content Analysis Study

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(5):e26654

DOI: 10.2196/26654

PMID: 33983127

PMCID: 8160790

Assessing Suicide Reporting on Social Media According to the WHO Guidelines: A Content Analysis Study of Ten Chinese Mainstream Publishers

  • Kaisheng Lai; 
  • Dan Li; 
  • Huijuan Peng; 
  • Jingyuan Zhao; 
  • Lingnan He

ABSTRACT

Background:

Previous studies have shown that suicide reporting in mainstream media has a significant impact on suicidal behaviors (e.g., irresponsible suicide reporting can trigger imitative suicide). Nowadays, traditional mainstream media are increasingly using social media platforms to disseminate information on public-related topics, including health. However, there is little empirical research on how mainstream media portrays suicide on social media platforms and the quality of their coverage.

Objective:

This study aims to explore the characteristics and quality of suicide reporting by mainstream publishers via social media in China.

Methods:

Via the application programming interface of the social media accounts of 10 Chinese mainstream publishers (e.g., People’s Daily and Beijing News), we obtained 2366 suicide reporting. This study conducted content analysis to demonstrate the characteristics and quality of suicide reporting. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, we assessed the quality of suicide reporting by indicators of harmful information or helpful information.

Results:

Chinese mainstream publishers preferred to report on suicide caused by conflict (e.g., family conflicts) on their social media, and underreported suicide in older adults and rural areas. Harmful reporting practices were common (e.g., 54.61% of the reports containing suicide-related words in the headline and 49.54% having disclosed suicide victims’ images.) Helpful reporting practices were very limited (e.g., less than 0.1% reports having provided direct information about support programs.)

Conclusions:

The suicide reporting of mainstream publishers on social media in China broadly had low adherence to the WHO guidelines. We suggest developing national suicide reporting guidelines that apply to social media. By effectively playing their separate roles, we believe that social media practitioners, health institutions, social organizations, and the general public can endeavor to promote responsible suicide reporting in the Chinese social media environment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lai K, Li D, Peng H, Zhao J, He L

Assessing Suicide Reporting in Top Newspaper Social Media Accounts in China: Content Analysis Study

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(5):e26654

DOI: 10.2196/26654

PMID: 33983127

PMCID: 8160790

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.