Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 29, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 17, 2020 - Feb 11, 2021
Date Accepted: Jul 5, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring Test-Retest Reliability and Longitudinal Stability of Digital Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease in the m-Power Data Set: Cohort Study

Sahandi Far M, Eickhoff SB, Goni M, Dukart J

Exploring Test-Retest Reliability and Longitudinal Stability of Digital Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease in the m-Power Data Set: Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e26608

DOI: 10.2196/26608

PMID: 34515645

PMCID: 8477293

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Exploring test retest reliability and longitudinal stability of digital biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease in the m-Power dataset

  • Mehran Sahandi Far; 
  • Simon B. Eickhoff; 
  • Maria Goni; 
  • Juergen Dukart

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital biomarkers (DB) as captured using sensors embedded in modern smart devices are a promising technology for home-based symptom monitoring in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Despite extensive application in recent studies test-retest reliability and longitudinal stability of DB has not been well addressed in this context.

Objective:

We utilized the large-scale m-Power dataset to establish the test-retest reliability and longitudinal stability of gait, balance, voice and tapping tasks in an unsupervised and self-administered daily life setting in PD patients and healthy volunteers.

Methods:

Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were computed to estimate the test-retest reliability of features that also differentiate between PD and healthy volunteers. In addition, we tested for longitudinal stability of DB measures in PD and HC as well as for their sensitivity to PD medication effects.

Results:

Among the features differing between PD and HC, only few tapping and voice features had good to excellent test-retest reliabilities and medium to large effect sizes. All other features performed poorly in this respect. Only few features were sensitive to medication effects. The longitudinal analyses revealed significant alterations over time across a variety of features and in particular for the tapping task.

Conclusions:

These results indicate the need for further development of more standardized, sensitive and reliable DB for application in self-administered remote studies in PD patients. Motivational, learning and other confounds may cause a variation in performance that needs to be considered in DB longitudinal applications. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sahandi Far M, Eickhoff SB, Goni M, Dukart J

Exploring Test-Retest Reliability and Longitudinal Stability of Digital Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease in the m-Power Data Set: Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e26608

DOI: 10.2196/26608

PMID: 34515645

PMCID: 8477293

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.