Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 16, 2020
Date Accepted: May 6, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Feb 10, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Technology Use and BMI: Evidence From a Cross-sectional Analysis of an Adolescent Cohort Study

Shen C, Dumontheil I, Thomas M, Röösli M, Elliott P, Toledano M

Digital Technology Use and BMI: Evidence From a Cross-sectional Analysis of an Adolescent Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e26485

DOI: 10.2196/26485

PMID: 35143408

PMCID: 8406110

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Digital Technology Use and Body Weight: Evidence From an Adolescent Cohort Study

  • Chen Shen; 
  • Iroise Dumontheil; 
  • Michael Thomas; 
  • Martin Röösli; 
  • Paul Elliott; 
  • Mireille Toledano

ABSTRACT

Background:

Use of digital technology such as mobile phones is ubiquitous in adolescents. However, excessive usage may have adverse health effects.

Objective:

We aimed to assess the social predictors of digital technology use and their association with body weight outcomes in a large cohort of adolescents.

Methods:

We used baseline data from a subset of a large adolescent cohort of 39 schools across Greater London who participated in the Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones (n=1,473). Digital technology use included phone calls, internet use on mobile phones, and video gaming on any device. Multi-level regression was used to assess the associations between digital technology use and age- and sex-specific body mass index (BMI) z-score and overweight (including obesity) derived from measured height and weight. We examined whether the associations were mediated by insufficient sleep.

Results:

Generally, participants with lower socioeconomic status reported more use of digital technology. Internet use on mobile phones for more than 3 h per day was associated with higher BMI z-score (adjusted β=0.30, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.11, 0.48) and greater odds of being overweight (adjusted odds ratio=1.60, 95% CI 1.09, 2.34), compared with low use (≤30 min). Similar associations between video gaming and body weight were found. BMI z-score was more strongly related to weekday digital technology use (internet use on mobile phones and video gaming) than weekend use. Insufficient sleep partly mediated the associations between weekday digital technology use and BMI z-score (proportion of mediation from 9.0% to 16.2%) by an indirect effect.

Conclusions:

We found an association between digital technology use and body weight in adolescents, partly mediated by insufficient sleep, suggesting underlying mechanisms may be multi-factorial. Further research with longitudinal data is essential to explore the direction of relationships.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shen C, Dumontheil I, Thomas M, Röösli M, Elliott P, Toledano M

Digital Technology Use and BMI: Evidence From a Cross-sectional Analysis of an Adolescent Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e26485

DOI: 10.2196/26485

PMID: 35143408

PMCID: 8406110

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.