Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Dec 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 5, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 2, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Radical embedding combined dynamic embedding based BERT in Bi-LSTM-CRF model for Chinese named entity recognition from Adverse Drug Event records
ABSTRACT
Background:
With the increasing variety of drugs, the incidence of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) is increasing year by year. Massive ADEs are recorded in Electronic Medical Records and Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reports which are important source of potential ADRs information.
Objective:
Meanwhile, it is essential to make latent ADR information to be available automatically for better post-marketing drug safety reevaluation and pharmacovigilance. This present study describes how to identify ADR-related information from Chinese ADE reports.
Methods:
Our study established an efficient automated tool, named BBC-Radical (BBC-Radical is model that consists of three components – Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory (Bi-LSTM), and Conditional Random Field (CRF)) model to identify ADR-related information from Chinese ADR reports. Token features and radical features of Chinese characters are used to represent the common meaning of a group of words. BERT and Bi-LSTM-CRF were novel models combined these features to conduct Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks in the free-text section of 24,890 ADR reports of Jiangsu Province Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center from 2010 to 2016. Moreover, the Man-Machine comparison experiment on the ADE records of Drum Tower hospital was designed to compare the NER performance between BBC-Radical model and manual method.
Results:
The NER model achieved relatively high performance of Precision of 96.41%, Recall of 96.03%, and F1 score of 96.22%. It was indicated the performance of the BBC-Radical model (Precision: 87.17%, Recall: 85.69%, and F1 score: 86.43%) is much better than that of the manual method (Precision: 86.1%, Recall: 73.8%, and F1 score: 79.5%) in the recognition task of each kind of entity.
Conclusions:
The proposed model shows competition in ADR related information extraction from ADE reports and the results suggested that the application of our method in the information extraction of ADR related information is of great significance in improving the quality of ADR reports and post-marketing drug safety evaluation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.