Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 9, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 6, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Effectiveness of NoteAid in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Patients

Lalor JP, Hu W, Tran M, Wu H, Mazor KM, Yu H

Evaluating the Effectiveness of NoteAid in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Patients

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(5):e26354

DOI: 10.2196/26354

PMID: 33983124

PMCID: 8160802

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of NoteAid in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Control Trial

  • John P. Lalor; 
  • Wen Hu; 
  • Matthew Tran; 
  • Hao Wu; 
  • Kathleen M. Mazor; 
  • Hong Yu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Interventions to define medical jargon have been shown to improve Electronic Health Record (EHR) note comprehension among crowdsourced participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT). However, AMT participants may not be representative of the general population nor patients who are most at-risk for low health literacy.

Objective:

In this work we assess the efficacy of an intervention (NoteAid) on EHR note comprehension for participants in a community hospital setting.

Methods:

Participants were recruited from Lowell General Hospital (LGH), a community hospital in Massachusetts, to take the ComprehENotes test, a web-based test of EHR note comprehension. Participants were randomly assigned to control (85) or intervention (89) groups to take the test without or with NoteAid, respectively. For comparison, we used a sample of 200 participants recruited from AMT to take the ComprehENotes test (100 control and 100 intervention).

Results:

174 participants were recruited from LGH, 200 participants were recruited from AMT. Participants in both intervention groups (community hospital and AMT) scored significantly higher than participants in the control groups (P < 0.001). The average score for the community hospital participants was significantly lower than the average score for the AMT participants (P < 0.001), consistent with the lower education levels in the community hospital sample. Education level had a significant effect on scores for the community hospital participants (P < 0.0005).

Conclusions:

Use of NoteAid was associated with significantly improved EHR note comprehension in both community hospital and AMT samples. Our results demonstrate the generalizability of ComprehENotes as a test of EHR note comprehension and the effectiveness of NoteAid for improving EHR note comprehension.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lalor JP, Hu W, Tran M, Wu H, Mazor KM, Yu H

Evaluating the Effectiveness of NoteAid in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Patients

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(5):e26354

DOI: 10.2196/26354

PMID: 33983124

PMCID: 8160802

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.