Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Dec 1, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 2, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review

Hill JR, Brown JC, Campbell NL, Holden RJ

Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(11):e26181

DOI: 10.2196/26181

PMID: 34726604

PMCID: 8596282

Usability-in-Place: A Rapid Review of Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults

  • Jordan R. Hill; 
  • Janetta C. Brown; 
  • Noll L. Campbell; 
  • Richard J. Holden

ABSTRACT

Background:

Technology can benefit older adults in many ways, including by facilitating remote access to services, communication, and socialization, for convenience or out of necessity when individuals are homebound. As people of all ages, but especially older adults self-quarantined and sheltered in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of usability-in-place became clear. To understand remote use of technology in an ecological valid manner, researchers and others must be able to test usability remotely. Without remote usability testing methods, certain individuals may be excluded and thus technology may be sub-optimally designed, developed, or supported. Further, usability issues such as slow internet or lighting in the home can only be validly assessed in situ.

Objective:

Our objective was to review practical approaches for and findings about remote usability testing, particularly with older adults.

Methods:

We performed a rapid review of the literature and report on available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and practical recommendations. This review also reports recommendations from the literature for usability testing with older adults.

Results:

Critically, we identified a gap in the literature: a lack of remote usability testing methods, tools, or strategies for older adults, despite this population’s increased remote technology use and needs (e.g. due to disability or technology experience).

Conclusions:

We call on the human factors research and practice community to address this gap, towards better supporting older adults and other homebound or mobility restricted individuals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hill JR, Brown JC, Campbell NL, Holden RJ

Usability-In-Place—Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(11):e26181

DOI: 10.2196/26181

PMID: 34726604

PMCID: 8596282

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.