Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Dec 12, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 11, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study

Jones C, Miguel-Cruz A, Brémault-Phillips S

Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;8(2):e26078

DOI: 10.2196/26078

PMID: 33983125

PMCID: 8160786

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Technology Acceptance and Usability of the Brain FX® Screen in Canadian Military Members and Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mixed Methods UTAUT Study

  • Chelsea Jones; 
  • Antonio Miguel-Cruz; 
  • Suzette Brémault-Phillips

ABSTRACT

Background:

Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) service members (SMs) and veterans exhibit higher rates of injuries and illnesses such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI), which can cause and exacerbate cognitive dysfunction. Computerized neurocognitive assessment tools (NCATs) have demonstrated increased reliability and efficiency compared to traditional cognitive assessment tools. Without assessing the degree of technology acceptance and perception of usability to the end users, it is difficult to know if a technology-based assessment will be used successfully in wider clinical practice. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model is commonly utilized to address technology acceptance and usability of applications in 5 constructs.

Objective:

To determine the technology acceptance and usability of a NCAT, titled the Brain FX® Screen, by CAF-SMs and veterans with PTSD utilizing the UTAUT model.

Methods:

This mixed-methods embedded pilot study had CAF-SMs and veterans (n=21) 18-60 years of age with a diagnosis of PTSD complete pre/post questionnaires on the same day the Brain FX® Screen was utilized. A partial least square structural equation model was utilized to analyze questionnaire results. Qualitative data was assessed via thematic analysis.

Results:

Facilitating conditions, which was the most notable predictor of behavioural intention, increased after using the Brain FX® screen, while effort expectancy decreased. Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social interaction were not factors in predicting behavioural intention.

Conclusions:

The Brain FX® Screen appears to be a feasible, usable, and accepted assessment tool for CAF-SMs and veterans who experience PTSD.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jones C, Miguel-Cruz A, Brémault-Phillips S

Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2021;8(2):e26078

DOI: 10.2196/26078

PMID: 33983125

PMCID: 8160786

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.