Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Nov 26, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 3, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Real-World Experience of mHealth Implementation in Clinical Practice (the Box): Design and Usability Study

Biersteker TE, Hilt AD, van der Velde ET, Schalij MJ, Treskes RW

Real-World Experience of mHealth Implementation in Clinical Practice (the Box): Design and Usability Study

JMIR Cardio 2021;5(2):e26072

DOI: 10.2196/26072

PMID: 34642159

PMCID: 8726018

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The Box: Methods and Results of a Real World Experience of mHealth Implementation in Clinical Practice

  • Tom E Biersteker; 
  • Alexander D Hilt; 
  • Enno T van der Velde; 
  • Martin J Schalij; 
  • Roderick W Treskes

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mobile health (mHealth) is an upcoming field of scientific interest around the globe. Potential benefits include increased patient engagement, improved outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. However, large scale implementation of mHealth care-tracks in daily clinical care is rare.

Objective:

To showcase the implementation and user experience with a large scale mHealth care-track in daily clinical cardiovascular healthcare.

Methods:

In 2016, an mHealth care-track including smartphone compatible devices - named ‘The Box’ - was implemented on the Cardiology department of a tertiary medical center in the Netherlands. Patients with myocardial infarction, rhythm disorders, cardiac surgery, heart failure and congenital heart disease received devices to daily measure weight, blood pressure, heart rate, temperature and oxygen saturation. Additional, professional- and patient user comments on experience with the care-track were obtained via structured interviews.

Results:

From 2016 until April 2020, a total of 1140 patients were connected to the mHealth care-track, which on average cost €350 per patient. Median patient age was 60.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 52.9-69.3) years, 73.6% were male. A median of 260 measurements (IQR 105-641) were taken on a median of 189 days (IQR 98-372). Patients praised the ease of use of the devices and felt more involved with their illness and care. Professionals reported more interactive and productive outpatient consultations as well as improved insight in health parameters such as blood pressure and weight. A feedback loop from hospital to patient to focus on measurements was commented as important improvement by both patients and professionals.

Conclusions:

An mHealth care-track with consumer grade Bluetooth devices, applied in diverse cardiovascular patients, is a feasible option for outpatient management. To create a continuum of care, however, development of feedback mechanisms and automation may not be forgotten.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Biersteker TE, Hilt AD, van der Velde ET, Schalij MJ, Treskes RW

Real-World Experience of mHealth Implementation in Clinical Practice (the Box): Design and Usability Study

JMIR Cardio 2021;5(2):e26072

DOI: 10.2196/26072

PMID: 34642159

PMCID: 8726018

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.