Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Validating digital assessments for remote clinical research
Jennifer Ferrar;
Gareth Griffith;
Caroline Skirrow;
Nathan Cashdollar;
Nick Taptiklis;
James Dobson;
Fiona Cree;
Francesca K Cormack;
Jennifer H Barnett;
Marcus R Munafò
ABSTRACT
In recent years, there has been a surge in using online platforms and personal devices to administer brief clinical assessments, in natural settings, and at regular intervals or in response to acute changes (e.g., in mood or behaviour). The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has accelerated interest in remote testing for clinical research programmes, given that face-to-face interactions are difficult or impossible, and it is possible that remote testing will become the new norm. The ability of remote research tools to collect granular, high-frequency data on symptoms and digital biomarkers is an important strength as it circumvents many limitations of traditional clinical trials and improves the ability to capture clinically relevant data. This approach can allow researchers to capture more robust baselines, and to derive novel phenotypes for improved precision in diagnosis and accuracy in outcomes. The process for developing these tools, however, is complex, as data need to be collected at a frequency that is meaningful but not burdensome for the participant or patient.
Citation
Please cite as:
Ferrar J, Griffith G, Skirrow C, Cashdollar N, Taptiklis N, Dobson J, Cree F, Cormack FK, Barnett JH, Munafò MR
Developing Digital Tools for Remote Clinical Research: How to Evaluate the Validity and Practicality of Active Assessments in Field Settings