Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Nov 22, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 29, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Benefits of Digital Health Resources for Substance Use Concerns in Women: Scoping Review

Quilty L, Agic B, Coombs M, Kristy BL, Shakespeare J, Spafford A, Besa R, Dematagoda S, Patel A, Persaud R, Buckley L

Benefits of Digital Health Resources for Substance Use Concerns in Women: Scoping Review

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(6):e25952

DOI: 10.2196/25952

PMID: 34096879

PMCID: 8218208

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Benefits of Digital Health Resources for Substance Use Concerns in Women: A Scoping Review

  • Lena Quilty; 
  • Branka Agic; 
  • Michelle Coombs; 
  • Betty-Lou Kristy; 
  • Jill Shakespeare; 
  • Adrienne Spafford; 
  • Reena Besa; 
  • Shadini Dematagoda; 
  • Alina Patel; 
  • Rebecca Persaud; 
  • Leslie Buckley

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health resources are being increasingly used to support women with substance use concerns. Although empirical research demonstrates that these resources have promise, the available evidence for their benefit in women requires further investigation.

Objective:

The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy or effectiveness for online or mobile interventions for risky or harmful substance use in adults who identify as female or women, or who report a history of trauma.

Methods:

This scoping review is based on an academic search in MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL, as well as a grey literature search in U.S. and Canadian government and funding agency websites. Of the 4977 records identified, 355 remained following title and abstract screening. Of these, 121 met all eligibility criteria and were reviewed and synthesized.

Results:

The 121 records reflected 96 distinct studies, and 85 distinct interventions. Investigations and the interventions evaluated predominantly focused on alcohol use or general substance use. Digital health resources evaluated included multi-session and brief session interventions, with a wide range of therapeutic elements. More intensive online and mobile interventions exhibited moderate to strong effects in the vast majority of studies, whereas brief interventions demonstrated smaller effect sizes at short-term follow-up periods. Most investigations did not assess gender identity, or conduct sex- or gender-based analyses. Only 10 investigations that included trauma were located.

Conclusions:

Despite the overall promise of digital health interventions for substance use concerns, direct or quantitative evidence for efficacy or effectiveness of interventions in females or women specifically is weak.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Quilty L, Agic B, Coombs M, Kristy BL, Shakespeare J, Spafford A, Besa R, Dematagoda S, Patel A, Persaud R, Buckley L

Benefits of Digital Health Resources for Substance Use Concerns in Women: Scoping Review

JMIR Ment Health 2021;8(6):e25952

DOI: 10.2196/25952

PMID: 34096879

PMCID: 8218208

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.