Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Nov 18, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 19, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jan 22, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Use of Telehealth in Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Services During and After COVID-19
ABSTRACT
Background:
COVID-19 social distancing guidelines caused a rapid transition to telephone and video technologies for the delivery of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. The study examined: a) adoption of these technologies across the SUD service continuum; b) acceptance of these technologies by service providers; and c) intention of providers to use these technologies following the pandemic. An additional analysis used the validated Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to test the rigor of the intent to use the technology post-pandemic.
Objective:
Specific hypotheses were that over 50% of organizations would use telephone and video technologies, that organizations would report statistically significant odds of increasing their use of technology after the COVID-19 pandemic, and that perceived usefulness of telephone and video technologies would mediate the effect of ease of use on intention to use.
Methods:
An on-line survey distributed between May and August, 2020 measured current use of telephone and video services, assessed perceived organizational readiness to use these services, and gauged intent to use telephone and video applications post-COVID-19. Seven of the 10 Regional Addiction Technology Transfer Centers (ATTCs), representing 43 states, distributed the survey. The unit of analysis was the organization.
Results:
Four hundred and fifty-seven organizations responded. Overall, there was widespread use of technology; greater than 70% of organizations reported using telephone or video for most services. For all but two services (residential and buprenorphine services by telephone), organizations reported significantly greater odds (mean OR = 3.79; range from 1.87 to 6.98) of intending to use technology to deliver services post COVID-19. Clinical users regarded video more favorably than telephone for all but two services. Readiness for telephone and video use was high across numerous factors, though telephone services were viewed as being more accessible. Consistent with the TAM, perceived usefulness and ease of use influenced intention to use both telephone and video technologies.
Conclusions:
The overall perceived ease of use and usefulness of telephone and video-based services provide a promising outlook for use of these services post the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should continue to review the acceptance of these services and their comparative impact on care outcomes. Clinical Trial: This trial is not currently registered since it was not an randomized controlled trial.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.