Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jan 29, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 31, 2020 - Feb 25, 2021
Date Accepted: Oct 10, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Health Data Security Considerations in Global Health Partnerships
ABSTRACT
Background:
Healthcare databases contain a wealth of information that can be used to develop programs and mature healthcare systems. Of concern, the sensitive nature of health data (e.g. ethnicity, reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, lifestyle information, etc.) can have significant impact on individuals if misused, particularly among vulnerable and marginalized populations. As academic institutions, NGOs, and international agencies begin to collaborate with low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to develop and deploy health information technology (HIT), it is important to understand the technical and practical security implications of these initiatives.
Objective:
Our aim was to develop a conceptual framework for risk stratifying global health data partnerships and HIT projects. In addition to identifying key conceptual domains, we mapped each domain to a variety of publicly available indices that could be used to inform a quantitative model.
Methods:
We conducted a non-systematic review of the literature to identify relevant publications, position statements, white papers, and reports. The research team reviewed all sources and used the Framework Method and Conceptual Framework Analysis to name and categorize key concepts, integrate them into domains, and synthesize them into an overarching conceptual framework. Once key domains were identified, public international data sources were searched for relevant structured indices to generate a quantitative counterpart.
Results:
We identified five key domains to inform our conceptual framework: 1) State of Health Information Technology, 2) Economics of Healthcare, 3) Demographics and Equity, 4) Societal Freedom and Safety, and 5) Partnership and Trust. Each of these domains was mapped to a number of structured indices.
Conclusions:
There is a complex relationship between the legal, economic, and social domains of healthcare, which impacts the state of HIT in LMICs and associated data security risks. The strength of partnership and trust between collaborating organizations is an important moderating factor. Additional work is needed to formalize the assessment of partnerships and trust, and to develop a quantitative model of the conceptual framework that can help support organization decision-making.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.