Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 17, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patterns and Influencing Factors of eHealth Tools Adoption Among Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Populations From the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017-2019: Questionnaire Study

Yang X, Yang N, Lewis D, Parton J, Hudnall M

Patterns and Influencing Factors of eHealth Tools Adoption Among Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Populations From the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017-2019: Questionnaire Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e25809

DOI: 10.2196/25809

PMID: 33599619

PMCID: 7932842

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patterns and Influencing Factors of eHealth Tools Adoption Among Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Populations: Findings from HINTS 2017 - 2019

  • Xin Yang; 
  • Ning Yang; 
  • Dwight Lewis; 
  • Jason Parton; 
  • Matthew Hudnall

ABSTRACT

Background:

Evidence suggests that eHealth tools adoption is associated with better health outcomes among various populations. The patterns and factors influencing eHealth adoption among the United States Medicaid population remains obscure.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to explore patterns of eHealth tools adoption among the Medicaid population, and examine factors associated with eHealth adoptions.

Methods:

Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey from 2017 to 2019 were used to estimate the patterns of eHealth tools adoption among Medicaid and non-Medicaid population. The effects of Medicaid insurance status and other influencing factors were assessed with logistic regression models.

Results:

Compared with the non-Medicaid population, the Medicaid beneficiaries had significantly lower eHeath tools adoption rates for health information management (11.2 to 17.5% less) and mobile health for self-regulation (0.8% to 9.7% less). Conversely, the Medicaid population had significantly higher adoption rates for using social media for health information than their counterpart (8% higher in 2018, P value = 0.01; 10.1% higher in 2019, P value = 0.01). Internet access diversity, education, and cardiovascular diseases were positively associated with health information management and mobile health for self-regulation among the Medicaid population. Internet access diversity is the only factor significantly associated with social media adoption for acquisition of health information (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.26-3.11).

Conclusions:

Our results suggest digital disparities of eHealth tools adoption between the Medicaid and non-Medicaid populations. Future research should investigate behavioral correlates and develop interventions to improve eHealth adoption and use among underserved communities.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yang X, Yang N, Lewis D, Parton J, Hudnall M

Patterns and Influencing Factors of eHealth Tools Adoption Among Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Populations From the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017-2019: Questionnaire Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e25809

DOI: 10.2196/25809

PMID: 33599619

PMCID: 7932842

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.