Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Feb 2, 2022
Bayesian Network to Predict the Risk of Post Influenza Vaccination Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Development and Validation Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Identifying the key factors of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and predicting its occurrence are vital for improving the prognosis of GBS patients. However, there is no publication on a forewarning model of GBS. Bayesian network (BN) model, which is known as an accurate, interpretable, and interactions-sensitive graph model in many other similar domains, is worth trying in GBS risk prediction.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to determine the most significant factors of GBS, and further develop and validate a BN model for predicting GBS risk.
Methods:
Large-scale influenza vaccine post-marketing surveillance data, including 79,165 U.S. (obtained from Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System between 1990 to 2017) and 12,495 European (obtained from EudraVigilance system between 2003 to 2016) adverse events (AEs) reports, were extracted for model development and validation. GBS, age, gender, and the top 50 prevalent AEs were included for initial BN construction using R package ‘bnlearn’.
Results:
Age, gender, and ten AEs were identified as the most significant factors of GBS. The posttest probability of GBS suggested that vaccinees aged 50-64 years old, male, and without erythema should be on the alert or be warned by clinicians about an increased risk of GBS, especially when they also suffer symptoms of asthenia, hypoaesthesia, muscular weakness, or paraesthesia. The established BN model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.866 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.865, 0.867), a sensitivity of 0.752 (95% CI: 0.749, 0.756), a specificity of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.879, 0.885), and an accuracy of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.879, 0.884) for predicting GBS risk during the internal validation, and obtained 0.829, 0.673, 0.854, and 0.843 for AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy respectively during the external validation.
Conclusions:
The findings of this study illustrated that a BN model can effectively identify the most significant factors of GBS, improve understanding of the complex interactions between different post-vaccination symptoms by its graphical representation, and accurately predict the risk of GBS. The established BN model could further assist clinical decision making by providing an estimated risk of GBS for a specific vaccinee, or be developed into an open-access platform for vaccinees’ self-monitoring.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.