Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 16, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Usability of Electronic Health Record–Generated Discharge Summaries: Heuristic Evaluation

Tremoulet P, Shah PD, Acosta AA, Grant CW, Kurtz JT, Mounas P, Kirchoff M, Wade E

Usability of Electronic Health Record–Generated Discharge Summaries: Heuristic Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e25657

DOI: 10.2196/25657

PMID: 33856353

PMCID: 8085750

Usability of Electronic Health Record-generated Discharge Summaries: Heuristic Evaluation

  • Patrice Tremoulet; 
  • Priyanka D Shah; 
  • Alisha A Acosta; 
  • Christian W Grant; 
  • Jon Tyler Kurtz; 
  • Peter Mounas; 
  • Michael Kirchoff; 
  • Elizabeth Wade

ABSTRACT

Background:

Obtaining accurate clinical information about recent acute care visits is extremely important for outpatient providers. However, documents used to communicate this information are often difficult to use. This puts patients at risk of adverse events. Elderly patients who are seen by more providers and have more care transitions are especially vulnerable.

Objective:

1) Identify the information about elderly patients’ recent acute care visits needed to coordinate their care. 2) Use this information to assess discharge summaries. 3) Provide recommendations to help improve the quality of electronic health record (EHR)-generated discharge summaries, thereby increasing patient safety

Methods:

A literature review, clinician interviews, and a survey of outpatient providers were used to identify and categorize data needed to coordinate care for recently-discharged elderly patients. Based upon that data, two heuristics for creating useful discharge summaries were created. The new heuristics, along with seventeen previously-developed medical documentation usability heuristics, were applied to assess four simulated elderly-patient discharge summaries.

Results:

The initial research effort yielded lists of 29 items that should always be included in elderly-patient discharge summaries, and 7 “helpful, but not always necessary” items. Evaluation of four elderly-patient discharge summaries revealed that none of the documents contained all 36 items; between 14 and 18 were missing. The documents each had several other issues and they differed significantly in organization, layout, and formatting.

Conclusions:

Variations in content and structure of discharge summaries in the United States make them unnecessarily difficult to use. Standardization would benefit both patients, by lowering the risk of care-transition-related adverse events, and outpatient providers, by helping reduce frustration that can contribute to burnout. In the short term, acute care providers can help improve the quality of their discharge summaries by working with EHR vendors to follow recommendations based upon this study. Meanwhile, additional human factors work should determine the most effective way to organize and present information in discharge summaries, to facilitate effective standardization. Clinical Trial: not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tremoulet P, Shah PD, Acosta AA, Grant CW, Kurtz JT, Mounas P, Kirchoff M, Wade E

Usability of Electronic Health Record–Generated Discharge Summaries: Heuristic Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e25657

DOI: 10.2196/25657

PMID: 33856353

PMCID: 8085750

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.