Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Nov 4, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 19, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jan 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Distance Management of Spinal Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Evidence-Based Patient and Clinician Guides From the Global Spine Care Initiative

Haldeman S, Nordin M, Tavares P, Mullerpatan R, Kopansky-Giles D, Setlhare V, Chou R, Hurwitz E, Treanor C, Hartvigsen J, Schneider M, Gay R, Moss J, Haldeman J, Gryfe D, Wilke A, Brown R, Outerbridge G, Eberspaecher S, Carroll L, Engelbrecht R, Graham K, Cashion N, Ince S, Moon E

Distance Management of Spinal Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Evidence-Based Patient and Clinician Guides From the Global Spine Care Initiative

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(2):e25484

DOI: 10.2196/25484

PMID: 33471778

PMCID: 7891494

Distance Management of Spinal Disorders in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Evidence-based Patient and Clinician Guides from the Global Spine Care Initiative.

  • Scott Haldeman; 
  • Margareta Nordin; 
  • Patricia Tavares; 
  • Ranjani Mullerpatan; 
  • Deborah Kopansky-Giles; 
  • Vincent Setlhare; 
  • Roger Chou; 
  • Eric Hurwitz; 
  • Caroline Treanor; 
  • Jan Hartvigsen; 
  • Michael Schneider; 
  • Ralph Gay; 
  • Jean Moss; 
  • Joan Haldeman; 
  • David Gryfe; 
  • Adam Wilke; 
  • Richard Brown; 
  • Geoff Outerbridge; 
  • Stefan Eberspaecher; 
  • Linda Carroll; 
  • Reginald Engelbrecht; 
  • Kait Graham; 
  • Nathan Cashion; 
  • Stefanie Ince; 
  • Erin Moon

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly limited the access of patients to care for spine-related symptoms and disorders. However, physical distancing between clinicians and patients with spine-related symptoms is not solely limited to restrictions imposed by pandemic lockdown. In most low- and middle-income countries, as well as many underserved marginalized communities in high income countries there is little to no access to clinicians trained in evidence-based care for people experiencing spinal pain.

Objective:

To describe the development and present the components of evidence-based patient and clinician guides for the management of spinal disorders where in-person care is not available.

Methods:

One set of guides for patients and one for clinicians were developed by extracting information from the published Global Spine Care Initiative (GSCI) papers. An international, interprofessional team of 29 participants from 10 countries on four continents participated. They included practitioners in family medicine, neurology, physiatry, rheumatology, psychology, chiropractic, physical therapy, and yoga as well as epidemiologists, research methodologists, and lay stakeholders. The participants were invited to review, edit, and comment on the guides in an open iterative consensus process.

Results:

The Patient Guide is a simple 2-step process. The first step describes the nature of the symptoms or concerns. The second step provides information that a patient can use when considering self-care; when to contact a clinician, or when to seek emergency care. The Clinician Guide is a 5-step process. 1. Obtain and document patient demographics, location of primary clinical symptoms and psychosocial information. 2. Review the symptoms noted in the patient guide. 3. Determine of the GSCI classification of the patient’s spine related complaints. 4. Ask additional questions to determine the GSCI subclassification of the symptom pattern. 5. Consider appropriate treatment interventions.

Conclusions:

The Patient and Clinician Guides are designed to be sufficiently clear to be useful to all patients and clinicians irrespective of their location, education, professional qualifications, and experience. However, they are comprehensive enough to provide guidance on the management of all spine related symptoms or disorders including triage for serious and specific diseases. They are consistent with widely accepted evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. They also allow for adequate documentation and medical record keeping. These guides should be of value during periods of government mandated physical or social distancing due to infections such as the COVID pandemic. They should also be of value in underserved communities in high, middle, and low-income countries where there is a dearth of accessible trained spine care clinicians, These guides have the potential to reduce the overutilization of unnecessary and expensive interventions while empowering patients to self-manage uncomplicated spinal pain with the assistance of their clinician, either through direct in-person consultation or via telehealth communication.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Haldeman S, Nordin M, Tavares P, Mullerpatan R, Kopansky-Giles D, Setlhare V, Chou R, Hurwitz E, Treanor C, Hartvigsen J, Schneider M, Gay R, Moss J, Haldeman J, Gryfe D, Wilke A, Brown R, Outerbridge G, Eberspaecher S, Carroll L, Engelbrecht R, Graham K, Cashion N, Ince S, Moon E

Distance Management of Spinal Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Evidence-Based Patient and Clinician Guides From the Global Spine Care Initiative

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(2):e25484

DOI: 10.2196/25484

PMID: 33471778

PMCID: 7891494

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.