Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Oct 29, 2020
Date Accepted: Feb 27, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Deep learning consistently detects misplaced chest electrodes when recording the electrocardiogram: An error that is commonly undetected by physicians
ABSTRACT
Background:
A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most common method to diagnose cardiovascular diseases such as acute myocardial infarction. However, there are a number of misinterpretations of the ECG caused by several different factors. One influential factor can take place during ECG acquisition where chest electrodes are misplaced.
Objective:
This research is the first experiment to build advanced algorithms to detect precordial (chest) electrode misplacement.
Methods:
in this article we used traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) to auto-detect the misplacement of electrodes V1 and V2 using features from the resultant ECG. The algorithms were trained using data extracted from high resolution body surface potential maps consisting of patients who were diagnosed with myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy or normal.
Results:
DL achieved the highest accuracy in this study for detecting V1 and V2 electrode misplacement with an accuracy of 93.0% [95%CI=91.46,94.53] for misplacement in the second intercostal space. DL performance in the second intercostal space was benchmarked with physicians (n=11 and age=47.3±15.5) who are experienced in reading ECGs (mean number of ECGs read in the past year = 436.54±397.9). Physicians were poor at recognising chest electrode misplacement on the ECG and achieved a mean accuracy of 60% [95%CI=56.09,63.90] which was significantly poorer when compared to DL (P<.001).
Conclusions:
DL provides the best performance for detecting chest electrode misplacement when compared to the ability of experienced physicians. Clinical Impact: DL and ML could be used to help flag ECGs that have been incorrectly recorded and that the data maybe be flawed, which could reduce an erroneous diagnosis.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.