Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Oct 18, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 18, 2020 - Dec 13, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 1, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of Intercom and Megaphone Hashtags Using Four Years of Tweets From the Top 44 Schools of Nursing: Thematic Analysis

Acquaviva K

Comparison of Intercom and Megaphone Hashtags Using Four Years of Tweets From the Top 44 Schools of Nursing: Thematic Analysis

JMIR Nursing 2021;4(2):e25114

DOI: 10.2196/25114

PMID: 34345795

PMCID: 8279434

Intercom vs. Megaphone Hashtags: An Analysis of Four Years of Tweets from the Top 44 Schools of Nursing

  • Kimberly Acquaviva

ABSTRACT

Background:

Journalists comprise the largest group of verified, active Twitter accounts (Kamps, 2015; Mullin, 2015), but little, if anything, is known about the ways in which schools of nursing use Twitter to invite attention from and engagement with journalists and other members of the media. This study seeks to fill this gap.

Objective:

The study sought to answer two questions: (1) To what extent are the top 50 schools of nursing using hashtags that could attract/invite attention from journalists and media outlets on Twitter?; and (2) To what extent are the top fifty schools of nursing being followed on Twitter by journalists and media outlets?

Methods:

For the purposes of this study, hashtags were considered to be either inward-facing or outward-facing. Inward-facing hashtags were those intended to invite attention from/ interaction with nurses, members of the University/School community, or attendees at a nursing conference or Twitter chat. Outward-facing hashtags were those intended to invite attention from/interaction with people outside of the nursing and University/School community. Among the 11,143 tweets containing at least one hashtag, 79.83% of hashtags used were inward-facing. Only 1.15% (n=668) of the 58,184 unduplicated user accounts following the forty-seven schools of nursing belonged to members of the media.

Results:

For the purposes of this study, hashtags were considered to be either inward-facing or outward-facing. Inward-facing hashtags were those intended to invite attention from/ interaction with nurses, members of the University/School community, or attendees at a nursing conference or Twitter chat. Outward-facing hashtags were those intended to invite attention from/interaction with people outside of the nursing and University/School community. Among the 11,143 tweets containing at least one hashtag, 79.83% of hashtags used were inward-facing. Only 1.15% (n=668) of the 58,184 unduplicated user accounts following the forty-seven schools of nursing belonged to members of the media.

Conclusions:

Although the top forty-seven schools of nursing have an active social media presence on Twitter, collectively their use of hashtags functions more like an intranet to communicate with other nurses rather than as a tool to invite attention from and dialogue with members of the media. This may help to explain why so few members of the media follow these schools of nursing on Twitter. Schools of nursing school highlight the work of their faculty and students by using hashtags to connect that work to current events of interest to the general public.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Acquaviva K

Comparison of Intercom and Megaphone Hashtags Using Four Years of Tweets From the Top 44 Schools of Nursing: Thematic Analysis

JMIR Nursing 2021;4(2):e25114

DOI: 10.2196/25114

PMID: 34345795

PMCID: 8279434

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.