Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Oct 12, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 20, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 26, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patients’ Experiences of Telemedicine for Their Skin Problems: Qualitative Study

Chow A, Teo SH, Kong JW, Lee SBM, Heng YK, van Steensel MAM, Smith HE

Patients’ Experiences of Telemedicine for Their Skin Problems: Qualitative Study

JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(1):e24956

DOI: 10.2196/24956

PMID: 37632855

PMCID: 10334905

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The Patients’ Experiences of Telemedicine for their skin problems: A qualitative study in Singapore

  • Aloysius Chow; 
  • Sok Huang Teo; 
  • Jing Wen Kong; 
  • Simon Biing Ming Lee; 
  • Yee Kiat Heng; 
  • Maurice Adrianus Monique van Steensel; 
  • Helen Elizabeth Smith

ABSTRACT

Background:

Teledermatology is a cost-effective treatment modality for the management of skin disorders. Most evaluations use quantitative data and far less is understood about the patients’ experience.

Objective:

This qualitative study explores patients’ perceptions of a teledermatology service linking public primary care clinics to the national specialist dermatology clinic in Singapore. A better understanding of patients’ experiences can help refine and develop the care provided.

Methods:

Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with patients who had been referred to the teledermatology service. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed before undergoing thematic content analysis.

Results:

Twenty-one patients aged between 22 and 72 years were recruited. Three themes were identified from the data of patients’ experiences: positive perceptions of teledermatology, concerns about teledermatology, and ideas for improving the teledermatology service. Patients found the teledermatology service convenient, saving them time, expense and liberating them from the stresses incurred when making an in-person visit to a specialist facility. They valued the confidence and reassurance they gained from having a dermatologist involved in their management plan. Their concerns included data security and the quality of the images shared. Nonetheless, they were keen to see the service expanded beyond the polyclinics. Their experiences and perceptions will inform future service refinement and development.

Conclusions:

This narrative exploration of users’ experiences of teledermatology produced rich data enabling a better understanding of the patient’s journey, the way they understand and interpret their experiences, and ideas for service refinement. Telemedicine reduces travelling and enables safe distancing, factors that are much needed during pandemics.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chow A, Teo SH, Kong JW, Lee SBM, Heng YK, van Steensel MAM, Smith HE

Patients’ Experiences of Telemedicine for Their Skin Problems: Qualitative Study

JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(1):e24956

DOI: 10.2196/24956

PMID: 37632855

PMCID: 10334905

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.