Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 10, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 7, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 11, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in the Prediction of Prognosis in Patients With Indolent Lymphoma: Prospective Study

AlShehry NF, Shanker R, Zaidi SZA, AlGhmlas F, Motabi IH, Iqbal S, Butt AA, AlShehri H, Tailor IK, Altaf SY, AlGhamdi M, Marie M, AlFayez M, Al Zahrani K, Dwaimah M, Al-Halouli T, Al-Shakweer W, AlShehery MZ, Zaidi ARZ, Gill AM, Albtoosh BM, Ahmed M

Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in the Prediction of Prognosis in Patients With Indolent Lymphoma: Prospective Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(11):e24936

DOI: 10.2196/24936

PMID: 34508363

PMCID: 8663482

Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging in the Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Indolent Lymphoma: A Prospective Study

  • Nawal Faiez AlShehry; 
  • Raja Shanker; 
  • Syed Ziauddin Ahmed Zaidi; 
  • Fahad AlGhmlas; 
  • Ibraheem Hussein Motabi; 
  • Shahid Iqbal; 
  • Ahmad Ali Butt; 
  • Hassan AlShehri; 
  • Imran Khan Tailor; 
  • Syed Yasir Altaf; 
  • Mubarak AlGhamdi; 
  • Mohammed Marie; 
  • Mansour AlFayez; 
  • Kamal Al Zahrani; 
  • Mohammed Dwaimah; 
  • Tahani Al-Halouli; 
  • Wafaa Al-Shakweer; 
  • Maied Zaher AlShehery; 
  • Abdul Rehman Zia Zaidi; 
  • Atta Munawar Gill; 
  • Belal Mohammed Albtoosh; 
  • Musab Ahmed

ABSTRACT

Background:

The role of FDG-PET in indolent lymphoma (INL) has been minimally studied.

Objective:

To assess the value of FDG-PET/CT in the prediction of prognosis in INL.

Methods:

We prospectively recruited 42 patients with indolent lymphomas. Two patients were excluded and 40 underwent a baseline PET/CT and follow up at various time points. Nine patients were observed, 7 received four doses of Rituximab alone, and 24 received chemoimmunotherapy. Metabolic response on follow-up PET/CT was assessed using SUVmax and Deauville criteria (DC). We aimed to obtain the best SUVmax/DC to predict optimal survival rates, risk stratification, and optimize therapeutic strategies. The mean follow-up from initial diagnosis was 33.83 months.

Results:

SUVmax <4.35 at interim PET/CT provided the best discriminator with progression-free survival (PFS) of 100% and median survival time of 106.67 months, as compared to 43.8% and 50.17 months respectively for SUVmax ≥4.35 (P=.041). This cut-off was also valuable in predicting overall survival (OS) at baseline, i.e. 100% OS with baseline SUVmax <4.35, versus 58.4% for SUVmax ≥4.35 (P=.133). OS of patients with baseline DC score <3.0 was 100%, with median OS 106.67 months.

Conclusions:

We demonstrated the utility of PET/CT in indolent lymphomas. SUVmax (<4.35 vs ≥4.35) at interim PET/CT performed best in predicting PFS.


 Citation

Please cite as:

AlShehry NF, Shanker R, Zaidi SZA, AlGhmlas F, Motabi IH, Iqbal S, Butt AA, AlShehri H, Tailor IK, Altaf SY, AlGhamdi M, Marie M, AlFayez M, Al Zahrani K, Dwaimah M, Al-Halouli T, Al-Shakweer W, AlShehery MZ, Zaidi ARZ, Gill AM, Albtoosh BM, Ahmed M

Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in the Prediction of Prognosis in Patients With Indolent Lymphoma: Prospective Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(11):e24936

DOI: 10.2196/24936

PMID: 34508363

PMCID: 8663482

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.