Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Jun 21, 2021)

Date Submitted: Oct 8, 2020

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Practical Lessons from the Speeding Research-Tested Intervention (SPRINT) program: A Discussion Paper

  • Wonshik Chee; 
  • Sangmi Kim; 
  • Mia Jang; 
  • Eun Ok Im

ABSTRACT

Background:

A culturally tailored technology-based cancer support program was recently developed and tested among Asian American breast cancer survivors to assist their survivorship process. To explore future opportunities to sustain the program, the research team participated in the SPeeding Research-tested INTervention (SPRINT) program sponsored by the National Cancer Institute.

Objective:

The purpose of this presentation is to share and discuss the lessons from the research team’s experience in the NCI sponsored SPRINT program.

Methods:

During the program participation, the research team conducted 73 interviews for customer discovery through WebEX, phone calls, and in-person visits (50 in-person interviews, 4 phone interviews, and 19 WebEx interviews). All the interviews were recorded using audio-taping or writing memos. Also, the research team wrote memos on the issues/concerns related to the project during the interview process. Then, the transcripts were analyzed using a content analysis. The themes from the analysis were used as the evidence to support the discussion points.

Results:

The themes reflecting the lessons that the research team learned from the SPRINT program included: (a) “who are the stakeholders”; (b) “depending on stakeholders”; (c) “what works or not”; (d) “personal versus family responsibilities”; and (e) “depending on countries’ situations.”

Conclusions:

The design and implementation process of technology-based cancer support programs need to consider the actual needs of stakeholders and current market situations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chee W, Kim S, Jang M, Im EO

Practical Lessons from the Speeding Research-Tested Intervention (SPRINT) program: A Discussion Paper

JMIR Preprints. 08/10/2020:24897

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.24897

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/24897

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.