Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Oct 4, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 23, 2021
Remote rating of atopic dermatitis severity using photo-based assessments: proof of concept and measures of reliability
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital imaging of dermatological patients is a novel approach to remote assessment and has recently become more relevant as telehealth and remote decentralized clinical trials are gaining ground.
Objective:
To investigate whether photographs taken by a smartphone are of adequate quality to allow severity assessment to be made and to investigate the usefulness of an established atopic dermatitis (AD) severity assessment instrument on the evaluation of photographs.
Methods:
During scheduled visits in a previously published study, the investigating doctor evaluated the severity of AD using the scoring atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) index and took photographs of the most representative lesions (target lesions) with both a smartphone and a digital single-lens reflex camera (dSLR). The photographs were then assessed by five dermatologists using the intensity part of the SCORAD (iSCORAD) consisting of erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts, and dryness (scale 0⎼3, max 18). The mean iSCORAD of the photographs was calculated and compared with the in-person assessments, using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for inter-rater reliability.
Results:
A total of 942 photographs from 95 patients were assessed. The iSCORAD based on smartphone photographs correlated strongly with evaluations performed in-person; iSCORAD (r=0.78, P<0.001), objSCORAD (r=0.81, p<0.0001), and total SCORAD (r=0.78, p<0.0001). For iSCORAD specifically, a Bland-Altman plot showed a difference in mean scores for in-person and remote iSCORAD of 1.31. In addition, the interrater agreement between the five rating dermatologists was 0.93 with 95% CI (0.911-0.939). A total of 170 lesions were photographed and the difference in mean scores was 1.32, 1.13, and 1.43 between in-person and remote evaluation based on photographs taken by dSLR camera, smartphone without flash, and smartphone with flash, respectively.
Conclusions:
Remote AD severity assessments based on photographs are strongly associated with in-person assessments, and smartphone photos can be used to assess AD severity to a similar degree as photographs from a dSLR camera. Further, the variation in how the dermatologists rate the iSCORAD based on the photographs is very low.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.