Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Oct 1, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 23, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Heart Rate Variability and Firstbeat Method for Detecting Sleep Stages in Healthy Young Adults: Feasibility Study

Kuula L, Pesonen AK

Heart Rate Variability and Firstbeat Method for Detecting Sleep Stages in Healthy Young Adults: Feasibility Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(2):e24704

DOI: 10.2196/24704

PMID: 33533726

PMCID: 7889416

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Heart rate variability and sleep: Validity of Firstbeat method in detecting sleep stages in healthy young adults

  • Liisa Kuula; 
  • Anu-Katriina Pesonen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable devices are used for providing objective markers of sleep.

Objective:

We examined the validity of heart rate variability based Firstbeat sleep analysis method (FB) against polysomnography (PSG) in a sample of healthy adults.

Methods:

Twenty adults (mean age 24.5 years, standard deviation (SD) 3.5, range 20–37 years; 50% females) wore a Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 measurement device and a Geneactiv actigraph and had an ambulatory SomnoMedics polysomnography measurement for two consecutive nights. We compared wake, combined Stage 1 (N1) and Stage 2 (N2), Stage 3 (N3; slow wave sleep, SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep between FB and PSG. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from the 30 sec epoch-by-epoch data.

Results:

We found that comparing FB against PSG yielded in good specificity (.75), excellent sensitivity (.95) and accuracy (.93) in detecting wake. Combined N1+N2 sleep was detected with .70 specificity, .66 sensitivity, and .69 accuracy. SWS was detected with .91 specificity, .72 sensitivity, and .87 accuracy. REM sleep was detected with .92 specificity, .59 sensitivity, and .84 accuracy. There were two measures that differed significantly between FB and PSG: FB underestimated REM sleep (mean 19 minutes, P=.025) and overestimated wake (mean 12.8 minutes, P<.001).

Conclusions:

This study supports the concept of utilizing HRV as a means for distinguishing sleep from wake and suggests that HRV is a useful marker in distinguishing different sleep stages.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kuula L, Pesonen AK

Heart Rate Variability and Firstbeat Method for Detecting Sleep Stages in Healthy Young Adults: Feasibility Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(2):e24704

DOI: 10.2196/24704

PMID: 33533726

PMCID: 7889416

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.